The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring livelihoods and environmental dependence: Methods for research and fieldwork
Open accessAbstract
Thousands of surveys on rural livelihoods in developing countries are being done every year. Unfortunately, many suffer from weaknesses in methods and problems in implementation. Quantifying households' dependence on multiple environmental resources (forests, bush, grasslands and rivers) is particularly difficult and often simply ignored in the surveys. The results therefore do not reflect rural realities. In particular, 'the hidden harvest' from natural resources is generally too important to livelihoods for development research, policies and practice to ignore. Fieldwork using state-of-the-art methods, and in particular well-designed household questionnaires, thus becomes an imperative to adequately capture key dimensions of rural welfare. This book describes how to do a better job when designing and implementing household and village surveys for quantitative assessment of rural livelihoods in developing countries. It covers the entire research process from planning to sharing research results. It draws on the experiences from a large global-comparative project, the Poverty Environment Network (PEN), to develop more robust and validated methods, enriched by numerous practical examples from the field. The book will provide an invaluable guide to methods and a practical handbook for students and professionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/15.2.225 · Cited by 4,339
Social Capital and the Environment
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00098-x · Cited by 1,764
Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires – Theory and practice in social research
Foddy, W., & Mantle, J. (1994) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0031-9406(10)61110-8 · Cited by 726
The rise and rise of citation analysis
Meho, L. I. (2007) · Physics World · doi:10.1088/2058-7058/20/1/33 · Cited by 371
Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published
Bourne, P. E. (2005) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010057 · Cited by 73
Cited by
Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis
Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N. J., Bauch, S., Börner, J., Smith-Hall, C., & Wunder, S. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,147
Self-citationForests, Livelihoods, and Conservation: Broadening the Empirical Base
Wunder, S., Angelsen, A., & Belcher, B. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.007 · Cited by 326
Challenging Perceptions about Men, Women, and Forest Product Use: A Global Comparative Study
Sunderland, T., Achdiawan, R., Angelsen, A., Babigumira, R., Ickowitz, A., Paumgarten, F., Reyes-García, V., & Shively, G. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.003 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- A., A., H.O., L., J.F., L., C., S.-H., S., W., & (eds.)
- Venue
- Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W1603411329
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.86
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring livelihoods and environmental dependence: Methods for research and fieldwork. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17528/cifor/003341
- The paper
- A., A., H.O., L., J.F., L., C., S.-H., S., W., & (eds.). (2011). Measuring livelihoods and environmental dependence: Methods for research and fieldwork. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/003341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.