Cited by 0Archaeology and Cultural HeritageHistory and Politics in Latin AmericaHistorical Studies in Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Historia, arqueología y mito. Un enfoque sobre el pasado de los caminos en Antioquia

Open access
Botero Páez, Sofía·2010·Boletín de Antropología

Abstract

Reseña: Camino ásperos y fragosos para los caballos. Apuntes para la historia de los caminos en Antioquia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17533/udea.boan.6953

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Botero Páez, S.
Venue
Boletín de Antropología
Published
2010-09-10
Volume
19
Issue
36
Pages
384-387
ISSN
  • 0120-2510 (ISSN-L)
  • 2390-027X
OpenAlex
W2142324641
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
book review
Language
es
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Boletín de Antropología (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository University of Antioquia (University of Antioquia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History and Politics in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Latin America
Keywords
road history, roads, Antioquia, myth, horseback travel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review