Cited by 34E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Administration and Political AnalysisPublic Policy and Administration Research

E-Government Effectiveness and Efficiency in EU-28 and COVID-19

Open access
Hodžić, Sabina, Ravšelj, Dejan, Jurlina Alibegović, Dubravka·2021·Central European Public Administration Review

Abstract

The task of every government, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic, is to provide services and goods for citizens and to maintain economic order. Therefore, the combination of legislation, the judiciary and administration is inevitable. Moreover, public administrations must transform the way they function by using more information and communication technology in order to remain responsive and efficient. This challenge was further revealed during lockdowns in individual countries, which affected their social and economic development. The solution to that challenge is the implementation of e-government in the public sector. It also increases innovation in governance processes as well as efficiency and effectiveness by offering more participative opportunities to citizens. Hence, a mature level of e-government development also arises. Nevertheless, there are significant differences among the levels of e-government development in the EU-28. The aim of this article is to assess the influence of e-government maturity on government effectiveness and efficiency in the EU-28. In order to obtain empirical results, a two-stage least square regression (2SLS) was applied. The empirical results show that e-government maturity positively and significantly contributes to enhancing government effectiveness and efficiency in the EU-28. In addition, the rule of law plays an important role in each stage regression model. Based on the empirical results, we can conclude that e-government is inevitable and should ensure the proper functioning of public administration during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17573/cepar.2021.1.07

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodžić, S., Ravšelj, D., & Jurlina Alibegović, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Rijeka (HR)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
Venue
Central European Public Administration Review
Published
2021-05-30
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
159-180
ISSN
  • 2591-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 2591-2259
OpenAlex
W3169622060
Cited by
34
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
24.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Central European Public Administration Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (P5-0093, J5-1789)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
e-government, e-government maturity, government effectiveness, administrative efficiency, COVID-19 pandemic, public administration, rule of law, information and communication technologies, EU-28, digital public services, governance innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review