Diversity and Habitat Preferences of Amphibians in Abbottabad, Pakistan
Open accessAbstract
Pakistan has reported twenty-four amphibian species, nine of which are endemic to the country.Amphibians in Pakistan are diverse, falling into four families: Dicroglossidae, Microhylidae, Bufonidae, and Megophryidae.The current study was carried out to investigate the amphibian fauna of several localities in District Abbottabad.From June 2019 to August 2020, a field survey was undertaken in District Abbottabad.Total dissolve solvent (TDS), Dissolve solvent (DO), Electrical Conductivity (EC), PH, Humidity, and Temperature (C) of several water bodies were also measured.A total of 100 specimens from the District were collected and stored in a 10% formalin solution.This study discovered that five species of anurans, i.e.Duttaphrynus stomaticus, Duttaphrynus melanostictus, Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis, Hoplobatrachus tigerinus, and Nanorana liebigii are members of the Bufonidae and Dicroglossidae families, respectively.Morphometric measurements were made using a non-digital vernier caliper with a resolution of 0.05 mm.HW, HL, SVL, TFL, THL, TBL, HnL, TD, END, IND, IOD, ED, LF, LH, FAL, LHU, UEW, PL, and PW were all measured.This research discovered that D.melanostictus and E. cyanophlyctis were also found but in lower numbers than D. stomaticus.The District had the lowest amount of H tigerinus as well as N. liebigii records.There is need to discovered more amphibians fauna in the District Abbottabad and all over Pakistan to update the identification keys of Amphibians.Novelty Statemen…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies have confirmed that good water quality positively influences amphibian diversity.
“Recent, studies have confirmed the positive influence of good water quality on amphibian diversity, aligning with the higher abundance observed in natural ponds such as Pond B in Ludhiana and Pond E in Jalandhar (Nessi et al., 2023; Hyongaju et al., 2023; Sheraz et al., 2024).”
From Comparative analysis of amphibian community dynamics in relation to water quality in pond types across two Punjab districts, India (2025) · cites this paper as Sheraz et al., 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Department of Zoology, P. A. U., Sekhon, G. S., Aulakh, R. K., Department of Zoology, P. A. U., Kler, T. K., & Department of Zoology, P. A. U. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Biology · doi:10.22438/jeb/46/1/mrn-5428
- Authors
- Sheraz, A., Ahmed, S., Mehmood, S. A., Khan, W., Panhwar, W. A., & Awan, F. S.
- Affiliations
- Hazara University (PK)
- University of Malakand (PK)
- Shah Abdul Latif University (PK)
- Venue
- Punjab University Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- ResearchersLinks Ltd
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1016-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 2313-8556
- OpenAlex
- W4398787895
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Punjab University journal of zoology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Keywords
- amphibians, Anura, amphibian diversity, habitat preference, Duttaphrynus melanostictus, Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis, Hoplobatrachus tigerinus, morphometrics, water quality, amphibian conservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review