Cited by 23

Project-Based Problem Learning: Improving Problem-Solving Skills in Higher Education Engineering Students

Husin, Muhammad, Usmeldi, Usmeldi, Masdi, Hendri, Simatupang, Wakhinuddin, Fadhilah, Fadhilah, Hendriyani, Yeka·2025·International Journal of Sociology of Education

Abstract

In engineering education, fostering problem-solving skills is essential for students to meet industry demands. Project-Based Problem Learning (PBPL) is a promising approach to enhancing these skills. This study aims to investigate the impact of PBPL on the problem-solving skills of engineering education students and explore their perceptions of PBPL. A sequential mixed-method approach combined quantitative pre-and post-test analysis with qualitative insights from interviews and questionnaires. The results indicate a significant improvement in problem-solving skills among students after implementing PBPL. Moreover, students expressed positive perceptions of PBPL, highlighting its benefits in enhancing critical thinking and collaboration. PBPL shows promise in enhancing problem-solving skills among engineering education students and has positive implications for teaching and learning in universities. The findings suggest that integrating PBPL into engineering curricula can effectively enhance students' problem-solving abilities, better preparing them for future challenges in the industry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17583/rise.15125

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In engineering education, problem-solving extends beyond retrieving information and instead requires students to identify, analyze, interpret, and evaluate complex problems through iterative reasoning and application.

    “In engineering education, this lens is particularly important because problem-solving extends beyond retrieving information and instead requires students to identify, analyze, interpret, and evaluate complex problems through iterative reasoning and application [13].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Aliu, J., & Aigbavboa, C. (2023). Key generic skills for employability of built environment graduates. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(3), 542-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1894633 · DOI
  2. Afzal, F., & Tumpa, R. J. (2025). Project-based group work for enhancing students learning in project management education: an action research. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 18(1), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2024-0150 · DOI
  3. Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students' critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929 · DOI
  4. Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100839 · DOI
  5. Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2019). The impact of an out-of- school STEM education program on students' attitudes toward STEM and STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics, 119(4), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12330 · DOI
  6. Bosevska, J., & Kriewaldt, J. (2020). Fostering a whole-school approach to sustainability: learning from one school's journey towards sustainable education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1661127 · DOI
  7. Bramerdorfer, G., Tapia, J. A., Pyrhönen, J. J., & Cavagnino, A. (2018). Modern electrical machine design optimization: Techniques, trends, and best practices. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 65(10), 7672-7684. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2801805 · DOI
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615 · DOI
  10. Cismaru, D.-M., Gazzola, P., Ciochina, R. S., & Leovaridis, C. (2018). The rise of digital intelligence: challenges for public relations education and practices. Kybernetes, 47(10), 1924-1940. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2018-0145 · DOI
  11. Coşkun, S., Kayıkcı, Y., & Gençay, E. (2019). Adapting Engineering Education to Industry 4.0 Vision. Technologies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies7010010 · DOI
  12. Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, L., Zhao, L., Zhu, X., & Xiong, J. (2024). The role of project- based learning with activity theory in teaching effectiveness: Evidence from the internet of things course. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639- 024-12965-9 · DOI
  13. Daley, J., & Baruah, B. (2021). Leadership skills development among engineering students in Higher Education -an analysis of the Russell Group universities in the UK. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(4), 528-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1832049 · DOI
  14. Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st century skills, and STEM careers within science teachers' conceptions of integrated STEM education. Education Sciences, 11(11), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737 · DOI
  15. Duffy, G., Sorby, S., & Bowe, B. (2020). An investigation of the role of spatial ability in representing and solving word problems among engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 424-442. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20349 · DOI
  16. Elaby, M. F., Elwishy, H. M., Moatamed, S. F., Abdelwahed, M. A., & Rashiedy, A. E. (2022). Does design-build concept improve problem-solving skills? An analysis of first-year engineering students. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(6), 101780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101780 · DOI
  17. Fadhilah, F., & Husin, M. (2023). Student Readiness on Online Learning in Higher Education: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16326a · DOI
  18. Fadillah, M. A., Usmeldi, U., & Asrizal, A. (2024). The Role of ChatGPT and Higher-Order Thinking Skills As Predictors Of Physics Inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(6), 1178-1192. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.1178 · DOI
  19. Funke, J., Fischer, A., & Holt, D. V. (2018). Competencies for complexity: Problem solving in the twenty-first century. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Research and Applications, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_3 · DOI
  20. García-Pérez, L., García-Garnica, M., & Olmedo-Moreno, E. M. (2021). Skills for a Working Future: How to Bring about Professional Success from the Educational Setting. Education Sciences, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010027 · DOI
  21. Gomez-del Rio, T., & Rodriguez, J. (2022). Design and assessment of a project-based learning in a laboratory for integrating knowledge and improving engineering design skills. Education for Chemical Engineers, 40, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.04.002 · DOI
  22. González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493 · DOI
  23. Hazrat, M. A., Hassan, N. M. S., Chowdhury, A. A., Rasul, M. G., & Taylor, B. A. (2023). Developing a Skilled Workforce for Future Industry Demand: The Potential of Digital Twin- Based Teaching and Learning Practices in Engineering Education. Sustainability, 15(23), 16433. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316433 · DOI
  24. Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J. C., Hernández Alcántara, D., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2019). Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13, 909-922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019- 00557-8 · DOI
  25. Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 551-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6 · DOI
  26. Husin, M., Usmeldi, Masdi, H., Simatupang, W., Fadhilah, & Hendriyani, Y. (2024). Validation of the project-based problem learning (PBPL) model book in higher education. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(4), 2025222. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025222 · DOI
  27. Jayathirtha, G., Fields, D., & Kafai, Y. (2024). Distributed debugging with electronic textiles: understanding high school student pairs' problem-solving strategies, practices, and perspectives on repairing physical computing projects. Computer Science Education, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2297738 · DOI
  28. Karan, E., & Brown, L. (2022). Enhancing Student's Problem-Solving Skills through Project- Based Learning. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v10i1.6887 · DOI
  29. Kirn, A., & Benson, L. (2018). Engineering Students' Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 87-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20190 · DOI
  30. Korucu-Kış, S. (2021). Preparing student teachers for real classrooms through virtual vicarious experiences of critical incidents during remote practicum: A meaningful-experiential learning perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6949-6971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10555-7 · DOI
  31. Lee, M. F., Sohod, S. N. M., & Ab Rahman, A. (2019). Exploring the mastery level of critical thinking and problem solving skill among the technical undergraduate. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2019.11.03.002 · DOI
  32. Lindvig, K., & Mathiasen, H. (2020). Translating the learning factory model to a Danish vocational education setting. Procedia Manufacturing, 45(2019), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.077 · DOI
  33. Lowell, V. L., & Ashby, I. V. (2018). Supporting the development of collaboration and feedback skills in instructional designers. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(1), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9170-8 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding the mediating effect of learning approach between learning factors and higher order thinking skills in collaborative inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2475-2492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10025-4 · DOI
  35. Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Setiawan, D., Maghfiroh, H., & Muhaimin, F. G. (2022). Empowering College Students' Problem-Solving Skills through RICOSRE. Education Sciences, 12(3), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030196 · DOI
  36. Mann, L., Chang, R., Chandrasekaran, S., Coddington, A., Daniel, S., Cook, E., Crossin, E., Cosson, B., Turner, J., Mazzurco, A., Dohaney, J., O'Hanlon, T., Pickering, J., Walker, S., Maclean, F., & Smith, T. D. (2021). From problem-based learning to practice-based education: a framework for shaping future engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1708867 · DOI
  37. Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001 · DOI
  38. Morris, T. H., & Rohs, M. (2021). Digitization bolstering self-directed learning for information literate adults-A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100048 · DOI
  39. Mubarak, Z. K., & Selimin, M. A. (2023). Significance of Innovative Learning Skills in the Era of Education 4.0. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(3), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.03.029 · DOI
  40. Murray, J. K., Studer, J. A., Daly, S. R., McKilligan, S., & Seifert, C. M. (2019). Design by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(2), 248-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20263 · DOI
  41. Mutanga, M. B. (2024). Students' Perspectives and Experiences in Project-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study. Trends in Higher Education, 3(4), 903-911. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040052 · DOI
  42. Muthmainnah, Ibna Seraj, P. M., & Oteir, I. (2022). Playing with AI to Investigate Human- Computer Interaction Technology and Improving Critical Thinking Skills to Pursue 21stCentury Age. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6468995 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Peerally, J. A., Santiago, F., De Fuentes, C., & Moghavvemi, S. (2022). Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries. Research Policy, 51(10), 104563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104563 · DOI
  44. Perusso, A., & Baaken, T. (2020). Assessing the authenticity of cases, internships and problem- based learning as managerial learning experiences: Concepts, methods and lessons for practice. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100425 · DOI
  45. Qadir, J., Yau, K.-L. A., Imran, M. A., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2020). Engineering Education, Moving into 2020s : Essential Competencies for Effective 21st Century Electrical & Computer Engineers. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274067 · DOI
  46. Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., AlGerafi, M. A. M., & Javed, S. (2024). Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-Century skills and student engagement in the math classroom. Heliyon, 10(23), e39988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988 · DOI
  47. Rodriguez-Sanchez, C., Orellana, R., Fernandez Barbosa, P. R., Borromeo, S., & Vaquero, J. (2024). Insights 4.0: Transformative learning in industrial engineering through problem- based learning and project-based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22736 · DOI
  48. Rossi, I. V., de Lima, J. D., Sabatke, B., Nunes, M. A. F., Ramirez, G. E., & Ramirez, M. I. (2021). Active learning tools improve the learning outcomes, scientific attitude, and critical thinking in higher education: Experiences in an online course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(6), 888-903. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21574 · DOI
  49. Roy, M., & Roy, A. (2021). The Rise of Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Education in the Era of Industry 4.0: Implications for Management Practice. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 49(3), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2021.3095426 · DOI
  50. Sangwan, K. S., & Singh, R. (2022). An experiential learning-integrated framework to improve problem-solving skills of engineering graduates. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12(2), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2021-0033 · DOI
  51. Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Education: Using Expert Wisdom and Research to Frame Educational Practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728 · DOI
  52. Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / sixth edition. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023- 01798-2 · DOI
  53. Tomasson Goodwin, J., Goh, J., Verkoeyen, S., & Lithgow, K. (2019). Can students be taught to articulate employability skills? Education + Training, 61(4), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-08-2018-0186 · DOI
  54. Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., Van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508-555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20347 · DOI
  55. Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students' critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599- 023-01508-1 · DOI
  56. Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: a meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Zeeb, H., Ostertag, J., & Renkl, A. (2020). Towards a Growth Mindset Culture in the Classroom: Implementation of a Lesson-Integrated Mindset Training. Education Research International, 2020(1), 8067619. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8067619 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Husin, M., Usmeldi, U., Masdi, H., Simatupang, W., Fadhilah, F., & Hendriyani, Y.
Venue
International Journal of Sociology of Education
Publisher
Hipatia Press
Published
2025-02-25
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
62-84
ISSN
2014-3575
Cited by
23
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review