Office Tasks 2019 – A Multimodal Dataset
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The data are freely available on the Open Science Framework (OSF).
“The data are freely available on the Open Science Framework (OSF)18.”
From Stress and productivity patterns of interrupted, synergistic, and antagonistic office activities (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stress and productivity patterns of interrupted, synergistic, and antagonistic office activities
Zaman, S., Wesley, A., Silva, D. R. D. C., Buddharaju, P., Akbar, F., Gao, G., Mark, G., Gutierrez-Osuna, R., & Pavlidis, I. (2019) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0249-5 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Pavlidis, I., Zaman, S., Wesley, A., & Blank, C.
- Venue
- OSF
- Publisher
- OSF
- Published
- 2019
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
