Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 546

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Executive summary

Open access
Smith, Sidney C., Jr.·2005·The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University Libraries

Abstract

"This Executive Summary is a synopsis of the full scientific statement from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), which is intended to provide up to date guidance for professionals on the diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome in adults. The metabolic syndrome has received increased attention in the past few years. It consists of multiple, interrelated risk factors of metabolic origin that appear to directly promote the develop- ment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This constellation of metabolic risk factors is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or the risk for this condition. The metabolic risk factors consist of atherogenic dyslipidemia (elevated triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, small LDL particles, and low HDL cholesterol [HDL-C] concentrations), elevated blood pressure, elevated plasma glucose, a prothrombotic state, and a proinflammatory state. At present, it is not clear whether the metabolic syndrome has a single cause, and it appears that it can be precipitated by multiple underlying risk factors. The most important of these underlying risk factors are abdominal obesity and insulin resis- tance. Other associated conditions include physical inactivity, aging, hormonal imbalance, and genetic or ethnic predisposition. Prospective population studies show that the metabolic syndrome confers an [almost equal to]2-fold increase in relative risk for ASCVD events, and in individuals without established type 2 diabetes mellitus, an [almost equal to]5-fold increase in risk for developing diabetes as compared with people without the syndrome. This finding implies that the meta- bolic syndrome imparts a relatively high long-term risk for both ASCVD and diabetes. In the absence of diabetes, the absolute short-term (10-year) risk for major coronary heart disease (CHD) events is not necessarily high. In the Framingham Heart Study data, the 10-year risk for CHD depends on other risk factors in addition to the metabolic syndrome components contained in Framingham scoring (ie, blood pressure, HDL-C). These other risk factors are age, sex, serum total or LDL-C, and smoking status. For individuals with the metabolic syndrome who do not have established ASCVD or type 2 diabetes mellitus, the absolute 10-year risk is best assessed by Framingham risk scoring."

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.17615/x6gg-7674

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 546

Metadata

Authors
Smith, S. C., Jr.
Venue
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University Libraries
Publisher
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University Libraries
Published
2005
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
322-7
OpenAlex
W1501993154
Cited by
546
References
0
FWCI
16.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Executive summary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17615/x6gg-7674
The paper
Smith, S. C., Jr. (2005). Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Executive summary. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University Libraries. https://doi.org/10.17615/x6gg-7674

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.