A dataset for microscopic peripheral blood cell images for development of automatic recognition systems
Open accessAbstract
The dataset contains a total of 17,092 images of individual normal cells, which were acquired using the analyzer CellaVision DM96 in the Core Laboratory at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. The dataset is organized in the following eight groups: neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, immature granulocytes (promyelocytes, myelocytes, and metamyelocytes), erythroblasts and platelets or thrombocytes. The size of the images is 360 x 363 pixels, in format JPG, and they were annotated by expert clinical pathologists. The images were captured from individuals without infection, hematologic or oncologic disease and free of any pharmacologic treatment at the moment of blood collection. This high-quality labelled dataset may be used to train and test machine learning and deep learning models to recognize different types of normal peripheral blood cells. To our knowledge, this is the first publicly available set with large numbers of normal peripheral blood cells, so that it is expected to be a canonical dataset for model benchmarking.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BloodMNIST is a 2D dataset based on a dataset of 17,092 images of individual normal cells, organized into 8 classes.
“The BloodMNIST is based on a dataset26,27 of individual normal cells, captured from individuals without infection, hematologic or oncologic disease and free of any pharmacologic treatment at the moment of blood collection. It contains a total of 17,092 images and is organized into 8 classes.”
From MedMNIST v2 - A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classification (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MedMNIST v2 - A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classification
Yang, J., Shi, R., Wei, D., Liu, Z., Zhao, L., Ke, B., Pfister, H., & Ni, B. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01721-8 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
- Authors
- Acevedo, A.
- Corresponding author
- Acevedo, Andrea
- ORCID
- Acevedo, Andrea
- Venue
- Mendeley
- Publisher
- Mendeley
- Published
- 2020-06-08
- OpenAlex
- W6962660505
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Mendeley Data (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- peripheral blood cells, cell image classification, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, immature granulocytes, erythroblasts, platelets, cell morphology, model benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review