Influence of the Number of Subcultures on Somaclonal Variation in Micropropagated Nanicão (Musa spp., aaa group)
Abstract
ISHS II International Symposium on Banana: I International Symposium on Banana in the Subtropics INFLUENCE OF THE NUMBER OF SUBCULTURES ON SOMACLONAL VARIATION IN MICROPROPAGATED NANICÃO (MUSA SPP., AAA GROUP)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rodrigues et al. showed that somaclonal variants appeared from the fifth subculture (1.3%) onwards and increased to 3.8% after 11 subcultures in Musa spp.
“Rodrigues et al. showed that somaclonal variants appeared from the fifth subculture (1.3%) onwards and increased to 3.8% after 11 subcultures in Musa spp.[163].”
From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [163]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 40
- Authors
- Rodrigues, P. H. V., Tulmann Neto, A., Cassieri Neto, P., & Mendes, B. M. J.
- Venue
- Acta Horticulturae
- Published
- 1998-09
- Issue
- 490
- Pages
- 469-474
- ISSN
- 0567-7572 (ISSN-L)
- 2406-6168
- OpenAlex
- W2589861744
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Horticulturae (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Banana Cultivation and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Keywords
- somaclonal variation, micropropagation, banana, plant tissue culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
