Cited by 4Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsPlant tissue culture and regeneration

Assessment of Molecular Diversity and In Vitro Clonal Fidelity in Some Indian Medicinal Plants

Purohit, S.D., Sharma, P., Nagori, R.·2015·Acta Horticulturae

Abstract

Aravallis, one of the oldest mountain systems in world is rich in plant resources including medicinal and aromatic plants. Due to biotic and abiotic pressures compounded by poor natural regeneration have made certain species threatened requiring immediate attention for conservation. They include Boswellia serrata, Feronia limonia, Celastrus paniculatus and Chlorophytum borivilianum. The present study therefore, was aimed to assess genetic structure of the natural populations of these species using DNA based molecular markers such as RAPD and ISSRs. Molecular evaluation of in vitro derived clones was also carried out to ensure clonal fidelity in micro-clones developed as a part of ex situ conservation strategy. Molecular analysis of all the four plant species yielded interesting data. In case of B. serrata no genetic variation was observed within the populations as revealed by RAPD and ISSR profiles. Analysis of data using various tool-sets reflected low gene flow among populations. However, in F. limonia the ISSR profiles revealed low but very significant amount of gene flow among the populations. Analysis of RAPD and ISSR profiles of C. borivilianum suggested significant diversity within 14 wild populations which could be clustered into 8 groups. Molecular screening of in vitro derived clones expressed absolute fidelity in F. limonia, C. paniculatus and C. borivilianum, irrespective of mode of regeneration and marker system used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1098.4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Translocations, insertions, and deletions involving specific DNA regions can disrupt gene function and expression, contributing to somaclonal variation.

    “Additionally, translocations, insertions, and deletions involving specific DNA regions can disrupt gene function and expression, further contributing to somaclonal variation [46].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 4

Authors
Purohit, S. D., Sharma, P., & Nagori, R.
Venue
Acta Horticulturae
Published
2015-09
Issue
1098
Pages
47-60
ISSN
  • 0567-7572 (ISSN-L)
  • 2406-6168
OpenAlex
W2591026191
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Horticulturae (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
Keywords
Boswellia serrata, Feronia limonia, Celastrus paniculatus, Chlorophytum borivilianum, medicinal plants, genetic diversity, clonal fidelity, micropropagation, ex situ conservation, gene flow, population structure, RAPD markers, ISSR markers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review