The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Abstract
The use of wireless communications and computing is growing quickly, and wireless technologies are an active area of research and application. Many myths exist about different aspects of wireless computing. The purpose of this article is to examine the more prominent popular beliefs in this area. We address these beliefs using a framework consisting of three dimensions: technology, business, and society. For technology, wireless’ limited bandwidth and its effect on new wireless applications and services are discussed. For business, the anticipated revenue opportunities of Wi-Fi and mobile e-commerce are addressed. For society, issues of wireless security and its effect on wireless adoption are examined. Based on these examinations, we propose research directions along each dimension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity
Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., & Landay, J. A. (2006) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124840 · Cited by 801
Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions
Fogg, B. (1998) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '98 · doi:10.1145/274644.274677 · Cited by 434
Chick clique: persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise
Toscos, T., Faber, A., An, S., & Gandhi, M. P. (2006) · CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1125451.1125805 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y · Cited by 2,137
Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2018-0665 · Cited by 1,839
Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-10-2016-0568 · Cited by 1,540
An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity
Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120968614 · Cited by 1,309
Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story
Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D'Amelio, A. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193235 · Cited by 1,084
Metadata
- Venue
- Communications of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2017-12-12
- ISSN
- 1529-3181 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2739904528
- Cited by
- 1,603
- References
- 5
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
