Sustainability of Free/Libre Open Source Projects: A Longitudinal Study
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the factors that influence the long-term sustainability of FLOSS projects. A model of project sustainability based on organizational ecology is developed and tested empirically. Data about activity and contribution patterns over the course of five years for 2,772 projects registered with SourceForge is analyzed. Our results suggest that the size of the project’s development base, project age and the size of niche occupied by the project are positively related to the project’s ability to attract user and/or developer resources. The ability to attract resources is an indicator of the perceived project legitimacy, which in turn is a strong predictor of the project’s future sustainability. Thus a project’s ability to attract developer and user resources is shown to play a mediating role between the demographic (size and age) and ecological (niche) characteristics of the project and its future sustainability. Our results support the applicability of tenets of organizational ecology related to the liability of smallness, the liability of newness, and population characteristics (niche size) to the FLOSS development environment. The implications of the results for future research and practice are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The goal of projects is to achieve competitive advantage over others.
“The goal of projects is thus to achieve competitive advantage over others (Chengalur-Smith et al., 2010; Karhu et al., 2018).”
From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as Chengalur-Smith et al., 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 58 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- University at Albany, Chengalur-Smith, I., Sidorova, A., University of North Texas, Daniel, S., & University of Pittsburgh
- Affiliations
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- University of North Texas (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 657-683
- ISSN
- 1536-9323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1534191040
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- free and open source software, project sustainability, organizational ecology, liability of smallness, liability of newness, niche size, project legitimacy, SourceForge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review