Cited by 97Open Source Software InnovationsSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering Research

Sustainability of Free/Libre Open Source Projects: A Longitudinal Study

Open access
University at Albany, Chengalur-Smith, Indushobha, Sidorova, Anna, University of North Texas, Daniel, Sherae, University of Pittsburgh·2010·Journal of the Association for Information Systems

Abstract

This paper examines the factors that influence the long-term sustainability of FLOSS projects. A model of project sustainability based on organizational ecology is developed and tested empirically. Data about activity and contribution patterns over the course of five years for 2,772 projects registered with SourceForge is analyzed. Our results suggest that the size of the project’s development base, project age and the size of niche occupied by the project are positively related to the project’s ability to attract user and/or developer resources. The ability to attract resources is an indicator of the perceived project legitimacy, which in turn is a strong predictor of the project’s future sustainability. Thus a project’s ability to attract developer and user resources is shown to play a mediating role between the demographic (size and age) and ecological (niche) characteristics of the project and its future sustainability. Our results support the applicability of tenets of organizational ecology related to the liability of smallness, the liability of newness, and population characteristics (niche size) to the FLOSS development environment. The implications of the results for future research and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17705/1jais.00244

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The goal of projects is to achieve competitive advantage over others.

    “The goal of projects is thus to achieve competitive advantage over others (Chengalur-Smith et al., 2010; Karhu et al., 2018).”

    From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as Chengalur-Smith et al., 2010

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 97

Authors
University at Albany, Chengalur-Smith, I., Sidorova, A., University of North Texas, Daniel, S., & University of Pittsburgh
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
Venue
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2010-11
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
657-683
ISSN
1536-9323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1534191040
Cited by
97
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
Keywords
free and open source software, project sustainability, organizational ecology, liability of smallness, liability of newness, niche size, project legitimacy, SourceForge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review