The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Special Issue Editorial –Accumulation and Evolution of Design Knowledge in Design Science Research: A Journey Through Time and Space
Open accessAbstract
Sir Isaac Newton (1676) famously said, “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.” Research is a collaborative, evolutionary endeavor—and it is no different with design science research (DSR), which builds upon existing design knowledge and creates new design knowledge to pass on to future projects. However, despite the vast, growing body of DSR contributions, scant evidence of the accumulation and evolution of design knowledge has been articulated in an organized DSR body of knowledge. Most contributions rather stand on their own feet than on the shoulders of giants, and this continues to limit how far we can see, curtailing the extent of the broader impacts that can be made through DSR. In this editorial, we aim at providing guidance on how to position design knowledge contributions in wider problem and solution spaces. We propose (1) a model conceptualizing design knowledge as a resilient relationship between problem and solution spaces, (2) a model that demonstrates how individual DSR projects consume and produce design knowledge, (3) a map to position a design knowledge contribution in problem and solution spaces, and (4) principles on how to use this map in a DSR project. We show how fellow researchers, readers, editors, and reviewers, as well as the IS community as a whole, can make use of these proposals, and also illustrate future research opportunities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240302 · Cited by 7,832 · cited 5×
“Peffers et al. (2007), for instance, define the nominal DSR process sequence as starting with problem identification and continuing through objectives of definition, design and development, demonstration, evaluation, and the communication of results.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSchmiedel, T., Müller, O., & vom Brocke, J. (2019) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428118773858 · Cited by 319
A Taxonomy of Evaluation Methods for Information Systems Artifacts
Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I., & Akoka, J. (2015) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1099390 · Cited by 278 · cited 2×
“In addition, an increasing number of studies applying DSR methodology have been conducted, such as those discussed in the study of Prat et al., (2015), who analyzed 10 years of DSR publications in the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars’ Basket of journals.”
BackgroundMethodText mining for information systems researchers: An annotated topic modeling tutorial
University of Liechtenstein, Debortoli, S., Müller, O., IT University of Copenhagen, Junglas, I., Florida State University, vom Brocke, J., & University of Liechtenstein (2016) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03907 · Cited by 199 · cited 1×
“Debortoli, 2016; Müller, Junglas, Debortoli, & vom Brocke, 2016) and to create and maintain taxonomies for different application contexts (Debortoli, Müller, & vom Brocke, 2014; Debortoli, Junglas, Müller, & vom Brocke 2016; Schmiedel, Müller, & vom Brocke, 2019).”
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future
(2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017160.2017162 · Cited by 179
Cited by
How Do Researchers (Re-)Use Design Principles: An Inductive Analysis of Cumulative Research
Schoormann, T., Möller, F., & Hansen, M. R. P. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_20 · Cited by 9
Gnewuch, U., & Reinkemeier, F. (2026) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2025/18742 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- University of Liechtenstein, L., vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., University of St. Gallen, S., Hevner, A., University of South Florida, U., Maedche, A., & Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2020-05-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 520-544
- ISSN
- 1536-9323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3026547558
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 5
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.