Changing the relations of surveillance: The development of a discourse of resistance in aboriginal epidemiology
Abstract
This article will describe an evolving relationship between a university-based research group and a regional First Nations political organization. In 1995, the Canadian government proposed to develop a National Longitudinal Aboriginal Health Survey. The authors have been involved in shaping this initiative, representing different perspectives in ensuring that First Nations' priorities are central to the process. Issues that have arisen include the politics of research, culture-based approaches to research ethics and methodology, and capacity-building as a primary objective. This article will also comment on the challenges that new research relationships pose to traditional accountability structures in university research environments. This article examines this initiative from a critical perspective, suggesting that traditional systems of public health surveillance are dangerous to the aspirations of marginalized communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When epidemiological research negatively portrays Indigenous communities without historical contextualization, it can be used to justify paternalism and threaten efforts of Indigenous self-determination.
“When epidemiological research negatively portrays Indigenous communities without historical contextualization, it can be used to “justify paternalism and threaten efforts of Indigenous self-determination” (Jaworsky, 2019, p. 2; see also O’Neil, Reading, & Leader, 1998).”
From Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada (2021) · cites this paper as O’Neil, Reading, & Leader, 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smylie, J., & Firestone, M. (2015) · Statistical Journal of the IAOS · doi:10.3233/sji-150864 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada
Hayward, A., Wodtke, L., Craft, A., Robin, T., Smylie, J., McConkey, S., Nychuk, A., Healy, C., Star, L., & Cidro, J. (2021) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100899 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Critical epidemiology in action: Research for and by indigenous peoples
Prussing, E. (2018) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.09.003 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
An allied research paradigm for epidemiology research with Indigenous peoples
Jaworsky, D. (2019) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-019-0353-1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Participatory epidemiology: Methods of the living with diabetes project
Thompson, S. J. (1999) · International Quarterly of Community Health Education · doi:10.2190/ex3h-dfa7-4hx2-telh · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- O'Neil, J., Reading, J., & Leader, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Venue
- Human Organization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 230-237
- ISSN
- 0018-7259 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3525
- OpenAlex
- W2014919676
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Organization (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- First Nations health, disease surveillance, resistance discourse, politics of research, research ethics, capacity building, research accountability, marginalized communities, Indigenous health research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review