Cited by 13Australian Indigenous Culture and HistoryIndigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Intercultural Practice of Local Governance in an Aboriginal Settlement in Australia

Moran, Mark·2010·Human Organization

Abstract

Drawing on research undertaken at a remote Aboriginal settlement, the paper describes the interpersonal interactions occurring in the practice of local governance, by conceptualising an intercultural field on which actors from a variety of institutional positions practice. Local governance in Kowanyama exhibited a political pluralism, encompassing a complex array of competing and at times balancing interests. Informal and formal checks and balances operated to curb the excesses of leaders. There was considerable diversity in the personal characteristics of leaders and of local organizations and forums. The pluralism and specialisation observed was an innovative response to the complexity of local governance and indicative of a political maturity in leadership and their constituency. Critical to local governance was productive relationships operating locally between leaders and trusted outsiders. The bulk of administrative burden was borne by a surprisingly small number of leaders and trusted outsiders, raising questions about how to broaden public participation in decision-making. The paper concludes by encouraging researchers and commentators to move beyond the notion of a narrow interface between monolithic opposing cultures, to the rich sociality that is occurring in the intercultural practice of local governance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17730/humo.69.1.84r6r24512846574

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. New Formations, 5, 5
  2. Many Ways Forward: Report of the Inquiry into Capacity Building and Service Delivery in Indigenous Communities
  3. Our Right to Take Responsibility
  4. All Free Man Now: Culture, Community and Politics in the Kimberly Region, North-Western Australia

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moran, M.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Moran, Mark
Venue
Human Organization
Published
2010-03
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
65-74
ISSN
  • 0018-7259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3525
OpenAlex
W2033493863
Cited by
13
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Organization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Australian Indigenous Culture and History
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
intercultural relations, local governance, Aboriginal settlement, political pluralism, leadership, checks and balances, citizen participation, decision-making, interpersonal interaction, remote communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review