The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restorying the Self: Bending Toward Textual Justice
Abstract
In this essay, Ebony Elizabeth Thomas and Amy Stornaiuolo explore new trends in reader response for a digital age, particularly the phenomenon of bending texts using social media. They argue that bending is one form of restorying, a process by which people reshape narratives to represent a diversity of perspectives and experiences that are often missing or silenced in mainstream texts, media, and popular discourse. Building on Louise Rosenblatt's influential transactional theory of reading, the authors theorize restorying as a participatory textual practice in which young people use new media tools to inscribe themselves into existence. The authors build on theorists from Mikhail Bakthin to Noliwe Rooks in order to illustrate tensions between individualistic “ideological becoming” and critical reader response as a means of protest. After discussing six forms of restorying, they focus on bending as one way youth make manifest their embodied, lived realities and identities, providing examples from sites of fan communities where participants are producing racebent fanwork based on popular children's and young adult books, movies, comics, and other media. Situating these phenomena within a larger tradition of narrating the self into existence, the authors explore broader implications for literacy education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.
de Zoysa, D. A., & Appadurai, A. (1998) · International Migration Review · doi:10.2307/2547675 · Cited by 18,135
The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
Thompson, E., Bakhtin, M. M., Holquist, M., Emerson, C., & Holquist, M. (1981) · World Literature Today · doi:10.2307/40136453 · Cited by 9,726
Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312032003465 · Cited by 8,057
Kress, G. (2003) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203164754 · Cited by 3,567
Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology, and Practice
Paris, D. (2012) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x12441244 · Cited by 3,335
Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom
Delpit, L. (1995) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358724 · Cited by 2,502
Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1683 · Cited by 2,270
Iser, W. (1980) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801821011 · Cited by 1,602
Orality and Literacy: 30th Anniversary Edition
Ong, W. J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203103258 · Cited by 1,441
Hills, M. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203361337 · Cited by 865
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, E. E., & Stornaiuolo, A.
- Venue
- Harvard Educational Review
- Publisher
- Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-338
- ISSN
- 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2520452803
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 197.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restorying the Self: Bending Toward Textual Justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.313
- The paper
- Thomas, E. E., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2016). Restorying the Self: Bending Toward Textual Justice. Harvard Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.