The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative Conceptualizations of Dyslexia: Evidence in Support of a Verbal-Deficit Hypothesis
Abstract
The history of our knowledge about specific reading disability—dyslexia—is checkered with different hypotheses and theories. In this overview of the literature Frank Vellutino critically examines the foci of four prevalent explanations for reading failure in children: visual perception, intersensory integration, temporal–order perception, and verbal functioning. Applying findings from his own laboratory investigations and other selected research to each of the four hypotheses,Vellutino argues that the verbal-deficit hypothesis offers the most convincing explanation. Through the use of direct and indirect evidence Vellutino demonstrates the relationship between reading problems and dysfunction in the semantic, syntactic,or phonological aspects of language. Finally, Vellutino pursues the implications of his position and asserts that the linguistic problems of some poor readers necessitate an emphasis on the internal structure of words in learning to read.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0 · Cited by 1,457
Freides, D. (1974) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0036331 · Cited by 362
Order error in immediate recall of sequences
Conrad, R. (1965) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(65)80015-9 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Teaching decoding with an emphasis on phoneme analysis and phoneme blending.
Williams, J. P. (1980) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.72.1.1 · Cited by 265
Ball, E. W. (1993) · Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/0161-1461.2403.130 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Vellutino, F.
- Venue
- Harvard Educational Review
- Publisher
- Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Published
- 1977-09-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 334-354
- ISSN
- 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5045
- OpenAlex
- W1925043077
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative Conceptualizations of Dyslexia: Evidence in Support of a Verbal-Deficit Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17763/haer.47.3.u117j10167686115
- The paper
- Vellutino, F. (1977). Alternative Conceptualizations of Dyslexia: Evidence in Support of a Verbal-Deficit Hypothesis. Harvard Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.3.u117j10167686115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.