Financial Aid: A Broken Bridge to College Access?
Abstract
In this article, Bridget Terry Long and Erin Riley argue that in recent years, U.S. financial aid policy has shifted its emphasis from expanding college access for lowincome students toward defraying the costs for middle- and upper-income families. They explain how loans, merit-based aid, and education tax breaks are increasingly replacing need-based aid and discuss how the declining role of grants may disproportionately disadvantage students already underrepresented in higher education. They document the rise in students' unmet financial needs over the past decade, showing that low-income students and students of color are especially likely to face substantial unmet need even after taking into account all available grants and loans, as well as family contributions. In response to these trends, the authors call for a greater emphasis on need-based aid, especially grants, to reduce the role of cost as a barrier to college access.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students cannot typically get loans from private credit markets to finance the direct and opportunity costs of college.
“A key market failure is that students cannot typically get loans from private credit markets to finance the direct and opportunity costs of college.”
From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Long & Riley, 2007
The market does not provide loans to fund an investment that will, in expectation, yield positive returns.
“This is a classic market failure: the market does not provide loans to fund an investment that will, in expectation, yield positive returns (Long & Riley, 2007).”
From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Long & Riley, 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions
Dynarski, S., Page, L., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30275 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- LONG, B. T., & RILEY, E.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- LONG, BRIDGET TERRY
- Venue
- Harvard Educational Review
- Publisher
- Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Published
- 2007-04-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-63
- ISSN
- 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2099077050
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 19.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- college financial aid, college access, need-based aid, merit-based aid, student loans, education tax credits, low-income students, students of color, higher education funding, financial aid policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review