Cited by 94Art Education and DevelopmentDisability Education and EmploymentInclusive Education and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Universal Design for Learning and the Arts

Glass, Don, Meyer, Anne, Rose, David·2013·Harvard Educational Review

Abstract

In this article, Don Glass, Anne Meyer, and David H. Rose examine the intersection of arts education and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to inform the design of better art, curricula, and UDL checkpoints. They build a case for the contribution of the arts to expert learning across the affective, recognition, and strategic neural networks and argue for making affective and reflective learning outcomes more explicit in the arts. Throughout this piece, the authors call for a vision of the arts playing an increasing role in providing engaging learning options in an integrated general curriculum.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17763/haer.83.1.33102p26478p54pw

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. T. (In press). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Universal Design for Learning.
  2. National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. (J. W. Pellegrino and M. L. Hilton, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 94

Metadata

Authors
Glass, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D.
Venue
Harvard Educational Review
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
98-119
ISSN
  • 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5045
OpenAlex
W2130360563
Cited by
94
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
79.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
Keywords
Universal Design for Learning, art education, curriculum development, affective learning, reflective learning, artificial neural networks, expert learning, inclusive curriculum, general education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review