The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dependency Distance as a Metric of Language Comprehension Difficulty
Open accessAbstract
Linguistic complexity is a measure of the cognitive difficulty of human \nlanguage processing. The present paper proposes dependency distance, in the \nframework of dependency grammar, as an insightful metric of complexity. \nThree hypotheses are formulated: (1) The human language parser prefers linear \norders that minimize the average dependency distance of the recognized \nsentence (2) There is a threshold that the average dependency distance of most \nsentences or texts of human languages does not exceed (3) Grammar and \ncognition combine to keep dependency distance within the threshold. Twenty \ncorpora from different languages with dependency syntactic annotation are used \nto test these hypotheses. The paper reports the average dependency distance in \nthese corpora and analyzes the factors which influence dependency distance. \nThe findings — that average dependency distance has a tendency to be \nminimized in human language and that there is a threshold of less than 3 words \nin average dependency distance and grammar plays an important role in \nconstraining distance —support all three hypotheses, although some questions \nare still open for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,161
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars
Hawkins, J. A. (2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 · Cited by 1,743
Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90027-h · Cited by 1,190
ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES.
Frazier, L. (1979) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 1,047
The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-Based Theory of Linguistic Complexity
Gibson, E. (2001) · Image, Language, Brain · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3654.003.0008 · Cited by 937
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 937
(1963) · Cited by 855
A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency
Covington, M. A., & Hawkins, J. A. (1999) · Language · doi:10.2307/417736 · Cited by 761
Cited by
How Efficiency Shapes Human Language
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piantadosi, S. P., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., & Levy, R. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003 · Cited by 485
Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages
Futrell, R., Mahowald, K., & Gibson, E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1502134112 · Cited by 455
Approaching human language with complex networks
Cong, J., & Liu, H. (2014) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.004 · Cited by 212
Self-citationJiang, J., Bi, P., & Liu, H. (2019) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666 · Cited by 109
Self-citationApplying large language models for automated essay scoring for non-native Japanese
Li, W., & Liu, H. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03209-9 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Institute for Cognitive Science
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-191
- ISSN
- 1598-2327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158600149
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 16.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dependency Distance as a Metric of Language Comprehension Difficulty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17791/jcs.2008.9.2.159
- The paper
- Liu, H. (2008). Dependency Distance as a Metric of Language Comprehension Difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2008.9.2.159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.