Psychometric Properties of the Persian Translation of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Open accessAbstract
Background: Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) is one of the most important instruments frequently used to assess sleep quality. This questionnaire is used to assess sleep styles and quality in adults through seven dimensions. Objectives: The study aims to investigate the reliability, validity and factor structure of the Persian version of PSQI. Materials and Methods: A Survey method with quantitative analytic approach was used in this research. A sample of 415 employees of Kerman hospitals participated in this study and filled the questionnaire. Forward-backward method was applied to translate the questionnaire from English to Persian. The following aspects of the Persian version of PSQI were evaluated: internal consistency (using Chronbach’s alpha), concurrent validity (correlation with GHQ-28), and factor structure of the questionnaire. Results: Mean age of the participants was 35.18 years, and participants’ average year of education was 15.3. The Chronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.55. According to the factor analysis, three factors were extracted accounting for 63.485% of the total variance. There was a significant correlation among different dimensions of the Persian version of PSQI. Concurrent validity analysis showed that PSQI and GHQ-28 were correlated significantly. Conclusions: The Persian version of PSQI exerted a satisfactory validity and reliability in our sample.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Standard and valid questionnaires were used in this study, and their psychometric properties had been assessed in Iran previously.
“Standard and valid questionnaires were used in this study, which the psychometric properties of these questionnaires have been assessed in Iran already.”
From Effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on mood, sleep quality and quality of life in menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
The Abstract and Discussion report that this study assessed the Persian PSQI’s psychometric properties in an Iranian hospital sample and found satisfactory validity and reliability. The Measures section also cites prior Iranian validation studies of the GHQ-28. The source does not establish that every questionnaire used in the citing study had been assessed in Iran. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 46
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [2]2. Walsh JK, Tepas DI, Moss PD. The EEG sleeps of night and rotating shift workers. Proceedings of a symposium on variations in work sleep schedules. Occup Environ Med. 1999;20(1):451-65.
- [13]13. Behroozi-far S, Zenoozi SH, Nezafati MH, Esmaeili H. [The study of the factors influencing the quality and quantity of nightly sleep in patients after coronary vassals conjunction surgery]. J YUMS. 2008;16:57-66.
- [15]15. Williams P, Goldberg DP, Mari J. The validity of the GHQ-28. Soc Psych. 1987;21:15-8.
- [24]24. Najafi M, Solati-e-dehkordi SK, Forooz-bakhsh F. [The relationship between job burnout and mental health among employees of Esfahan's Center for research and production of nuclear fuel]. JUMS. 2000;2:34-41.
- Authors
- Nazifi, M., Mokarami, H., Akbaritabar, A., Kalte, H. O., & Rahi, A.
- Affiliations
- Semnan University (IR)
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Allameh Tabataba'i University (IR)
- Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Mokarami, Hamidreza
- Venue
- Health Scope
- Publisher
- Brieflands
- Published
- 2014-05-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2251-8959 (ISSN-L)
- 2251-9513
- OpenAlex
- W2131007043
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Health Scope (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Persian translation, sleep quality, psychometric properties, cross-cultural adaptation, questionnaire reliability, factor structure, concurrent validity, GHQ-28, hospital staff
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review