The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LOCAL RECEPTIVITY CLIMATES AND THE DYNAMICS OF MEDIA ATTENTION TO PROTEST*
Abstract
Research on media attention to social movements generally examines a small sample of media outlets and a diverse sample of protest events. This approach has produced significant insight into the type of protests covered by the media but has minimized the role of media organizations. This study flips the approach taken by prior work: we examine coverage patterns of 1,498 nationally coordinated but highly comparable vigils against the Iraq War in 426 U.S. newspapers. We show that protest coverage is shaped by local receptivity climates, which emphasize the organizational and contextual features of media environments that influence media attention. We show that larger newspapers, those that covered the Iraq War more extensively, and those in areas supporting the Democratic Party devoted more attention to the vigils. Our results bridge the gap between the features of protest events that are newsworthy and the organizational routines that structure journalistic work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Media attention is often conditional on media proximity to events, journalistic professional norms, and activities in the issue-attention cycle.
“Media attention is often conditional on media proximity to events, journalistic professional norms, and activities in the issue-attention cycle (Gans 1979; Rafail, McCarthy, and Sullivan 2019; Seguin 2016; Wouters and Lefevere 2023).”
From WHEN BLACK MOVEMENTS MATTER: CONTROLLING IMAGES AND BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS IN MEDIA ATTENTION TO U.S. POLICE KILLINGS (2024) · cites this paper as Rafail, McCarthy, and Sullivan 2019
Protest proximity drives media attention.
“I employ two measurements of BLM protests because protest proximity drives media attention (Oliver and Meyer 1999; Rafail, McCarthy, and Sullivan 2019).”
From WHEN BLACK MOVEMENTS MATTER: CONTROLLING IMAGES AND BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS IN MEDIA ATTENTION TO U.S. POLICE KILLINGS (2024) · cites this paper as Rafail, McCarthy, and Sullivan 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lu, T. (2024) · Mobilization: An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/1086-671x-29-1-19 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Rafail, P., McCarthy, J. D., & Sullivan, S.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rafail, Patrick
- ORCID
- Rafail, Patrick
- Venue
- Mobilization: An International Quarterly
- Publisher
- Mobilization Journal
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 1086-671X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2926035654
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mobilization An International Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- media coverage, social movements, news values, journalistic routines, media companies, political affiliation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review