The DOI matches its Crossref record.
#AFRINGEMINORITY: TIKTOK’S PLATFORM VERNACULAR AND FRAMING COLLECTIVE IDENTITY IN THE FREEDOM CONVOY PROTESTS*
Abstract
This study uses a qualitative thematic analysis drawn from 813 TikTok videos to examine how TikTok’s platform vernacular shapes the expression of collective identity vis-à-vis collective action frames. This work explores the contentious case of the Canadian far-right freedom convoy protests between January 29 and February 21, 2022. This study finds that freedom convoy supporters’ framing of collective identity relied upon antipathy toward state intervention and nationalistic pride that desired a return to “normal,” moralized in the name of “freedom.” Additionally, this work finds that this identity work was augmented through three key vernacular practices: alternative broadcasting, monologuing, and audio memes. These vernacular practices shaped supporters’ identity work, instructing how the movement was collectively rendered on TikTok. Overall, this work contributes to our understanding of how social movements’ identity work practices are inextricably bounded through TikTok’s unique communicative culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Kajian Hollingshead (2025) mengenai protes freedom convoy di Kanada menunjukkan bagaimana teknik pembingkaian dan budaya komunikasi unik TikTok (platform vernacular) mampu membentuk rasa kebersamaan dan menyebarkan ideologi melalui naratif yang disusun secara strategik.”
From TikTok Algorithm and Digital Creed Challenges: A Framing Analysis of ‘The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light’ Propagation from an ASWJ Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as Hollingshead (2025)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Muhammad, M., Sapuan, M. Z., & Zahid, N. H. (2026) · Journal of Quranic Sciences and Research · doi:10.30880/jqsr.2026.07.01.003
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollingshead, W.
- Affiliations
- William Hollingshead is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Social Media Lab at Toronto Metropolitan University.
- Venue
- Mobilization: An International Quarterly
- Publisher
- Mobilization Journal
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-50
- ISSN
- 1938-1514
- 1086-671X
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: #AFRINGEMINORITY: TIKTOK’S PLATFORM VERNACULAR AND FRAMING COLLECTIVE IDENTITY IN THE FREEDOM CONVOY PROTESTS*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17813/1086-671x-30-1-33
- The paper
- Hollingshead, W. (2025). #AFRINGEMINORITY: TIKTOK’S PLATFORM VERNACULAR AND FRAMING COLLECTIVE IDENTITY IN THE FREEDOM CONVOY PROTESTS*. Mobilization: An International Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671x-30-1-33
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.