The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Iterative deconvolution and receiver-function estimation
Abstract
We describe and apply an iterative, time-domain deconvolution approach to receiver-function estimation and illustrate the reliability and advantages of the technique using synthetic- and observation-based examples. The iterative technique is commonly used in earthquake time-function studies and offers several advantages in receiver-function analysis such as intuitively stripping the largest receiver-function arrivals from the observed seismograms first and then the details; long-period stability by a priori constructing the deconvolution as a sum of Gaussian pulses; and easy generalization to allow multiwaveform deconvolution for a single receiver-function estimate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Transdimensional inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion
Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Gallagher, K., & Rawlinson, N. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008560 · Cited by 462
Caldwell, W. B., Klemperer, S. L., Lawrence, J. F., Rai, S. S., & Ashish (2013) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.02.009 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Ligorría, J. P., & Ammon, C. J.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1395-1400
- ISSN
- 0037-1106 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3573
- OpenAlex
- W2158711593
- Cited by
- 1,398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative deconvolution and receiver-function estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1785/bssa0890051395
- The paper
- Ligorría, J. P., & Ammon, C. J. (1999). Iterative deconvolution and receiver-function estimation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0890051395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
