The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disposal of Hydrofracking Waste Fluid by Injection into Subsurface Aquifers Triggers Earthquake Swarm in Central Arkansas with Potential for Damaging Earthquake
Abstract
Research Article| March 01, 2012 Disposal of Hydrofracking Waste Fluid by Injection into Subsurface Aquifers Triggers Earthquake Swarm in Central Arkansas with Potential for Damaging Earthquake S. Horton S. Horton Center for Earthquake Research and Information University of Memphis Memphis, Tennessee 38152 U.S.A.shorton@memphis.edu 1Center for Earthquake Research and Information at the University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information S. Horton 1Center for Earthquake Research and Information at the University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A. Center for Earthquake Research and Information University of Memphis Memphis, Tennessee 38152 U.S.A.shorton@memphis.edu Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © 2012 Seismological Research Letters (2012) 83 (2): 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.83.2.250 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation S. Horton; Disposal of Hydrofracking Waste Fluid by Injection into Subsurface Aquifers Triggers Earthquake Swarm in Central Arkansas with Potential for Damaging Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 2012;; 83 (2): 250–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.83.2.250 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Only a handful of the thousands of waste disposal wells across the United States have been linked to induced or triggered earthquakes. Still, two well-documented cases—Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Colorado, in the 1960s (Healy et al. 1968) and Paradox Valley, Colorado, in the 1990s (Ake et al. 2005)— demonstrate that fluid injection into the subsurface can trigger earthquakes. The largest event at Rocky Mountain Arsenal was M 5.2, and the largest event at Paradox Valley was M 4.3. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency provides Underground Injection Control (UIC) regulations administered by the states to protect underground sources... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity
Weingarten, M., Ge, S., Godt, J. W., Bekins, B. A., & Rubinstein, J. L. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1345 · Cited by 568
Oklahoma’s recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal
Walsh, F. R., & Zoback, M. D. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500195 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Horton, S.
- Venue
- Seismological Research Letters
- Published
- 2012-03-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-260
- ISSN
- 0895-0695 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2057
- OpenAlex
- W2143673685
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disposal of Hydrofracking Waste Fluid by Injection into Subsurface Aquifers Triggers Earthquake Swarm in Central Arkansas with Potential for Damaging Earthquake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1785/gssrl.83.2.250
- The paper
- Horton, S. (2012). Disposal of Hydrofracking Waste Fluid by Injection into Subsurface Aquifers Triggers Earthquake Swarm in Central Arkansas with Potential for Damaging Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.83.2.250
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.