The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Learning from Delayed Rewards
Open accessAbstract
In behavioural ecology, stochastic dynamic programming may be used as a general method for calculating animals' optimal behavioural policies. But how might the animals themselves learn optimal policies from their experience? The aim of the thesis is to give a systematic analysis of possible computational methods of learning efficient behaviour. First, it is argued that it does not follow from the optimality assumption that animals should learn optimal policies, even though they may not always follow them. Next, it is argued that Markov decision processes are a general formal model of an animal's behavioural choices in its environment. The conventional methods of determining optimal policies by dynamic programming are then described. It is not plausible that animals carry out calculations of this type. However, there is a random of alternative methods of organising the dynamic programming calculation, in ways that are plausible computational models of animal learning. In particular, there is an incremental Monte-Carlo method that enables the optimal values (or 'canonical costs') of actions to be learned directly, without any requirement for the animal to model its environment, or to remember situations and actions for more than a short period of time. A proof is given that this learning method works. Learning methods of this type are also possible for hierarchical policies. Previously suggested learning methods are reviewed, and some even simpler learning methods are presented without proof. Demonstration implementations of some of the learning methods are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
(2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.842673 · Cited by 24,496
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00992698 · Cited by 9,083
Self-citationReinforcement Learning: A Survey
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Moore, A. W. (1996) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.301 · Cited by 8,972
Ant colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem
Dorigo, M., & Gambardella, L. M. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585892 · Cited by 8,081
Metadata
- Authors
- Watkins, C.
- Venue
- OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)
- Publisher
- Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
- Published
- 1989-05-10
- OpenAlex
- W3011120880
- Cited by
- 5,297
- References
- 0
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning from Delayed Rewards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17863/cam.132164
- The paper
- Watkins, C. (1989). Learning from Delayed Rewards. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.132164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.