Leading practices for resource benefit sharing and development for and with Indigenous communities
Abstract
This OECD working paper summarises leading practices for benefit sharing, workforce development, and business and governance development for and with Indigenous peoples. This work has been informed by the OECD’s programme of work on Linking Indigenous Communities with Regional Development, on Mining Regions and Cities and on Indigenous Employment and Skills Strategies. This working paper specifically aims to inform the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Cities and Regional Development of Australia. The paper covers six key policy areas: i) Indigenous benefits funds and benefit sharing agreements, ii) Indigenous governance, iii) Indigenous entrepreneurship, iv) Indigenous education and training, v) Indigenous employment, and vi) Indigenous community programmes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collective Benefit ensures that digital benefit-sharing aligns with the values of the Indigenous communities affected, preventing the reduction of cultural knowledge to mere data inputs for AI profit generation.
“Philosophically, Collective Benefit ensures that digital benefit-sharing aligns with the values of the Indigenous communities affected, preventing the reduction of cultural knowledge to mere data inputs for AI profit generation (Raderschall et al. 2020).”
From Preventing AI extractivism: the case for braiding indigenous data justice with ABS for stronger AI data governance (2026) · cites this paper as Raderschall et al. 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schulz, M., & Loewen-Colón, J. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02931-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Raderschall, L., Krawchenko, T. A., & Leblanc, L.
- Affiliations
- Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
- Venue
- OECD Regional Development Papers
- Published
- 2020-10-28
- ISSN
- 2709-4065 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3096612675
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- OECD regional development papers (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Economic Development Administration
- Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- indigenous peoples, Indigenous employment, indigenous entrepreneurship, Indigenous governance, benefit-sharing agreements, workforce development, mining areas, regional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review