Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

OECD Study of Cross-National Differences in the Treatment, Costs and Outcomes of Ischaemic Heart Disease

·2003·OECD Health Working Papers

Abstract

FFS plan); Canada (drugs) Most countries have at a minimum universal public health insurance covering most acute and ambulatory care treatment Care delivered in public hospitals Cost sharing Korea Access to outpatient drugs: Canada, Denmark, Germany, Norway, Spain, UK, US Access to some private care services: Australia, Greece, Hungary, UK, US Japan (some inpatient and outpatient care) Non-existent or modest for physician and public inpatient services in most countries Gatekeeping Italy, UK, US (managed care) Australia,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/230112362071

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Venue
OECD Health Working Papers
Published
2003-04-22
ISSN
1815-2015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1652578547
Cited by
381
References
1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OECD Study of Cross-National Differences in the Treatment, Costs and Outcomes of Ischaemic Heart Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/230112362071
The paper
OECD Study of Cross-National Differences in the Treatment, Costs and Outcomes of Ischaemic Heart Disease. (2003). OECD Health Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/230112362071

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.