Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10Education and Labor RelationsLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Informal Employment Re-loaded

Johannes Jütting, Jante Parlevliet, Theodora Xenogiani·2008·OECD Development Centre Working Papers

Abstract

This paper provides a fresh look at informal employment, a phenomenon of renewed interest to policy makers and researchers alike. It finds that informal employment is likely to stay, is sometimes a voluntary choice, can offer better working conditions than formal employment and is very heterogeneous and diverse. Reasons for these puzzling facts and trends are discussed by focussing on incentives and constraints determining labour market outcomes. “Reloading” informal employment argues for a re-thinking of the current policy agenda and maps out important further directions for research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/245657753644

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jütting, J., Parlevliet, J., & Xenogiani, T.
Affiliations
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
Venue
OECD Development Centre Working Papers
Published
2008-01-01
ISSN
1815-1949 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206285372
Cited by
10
References
37
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
OECD Development Centre working papers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Education and Labor Relations
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
informal employment, labor market outcomes, working conditions, employment policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.