The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide
Open accessAbstract
This Handbook aims to provide a guide for constructing and using composite indicators for policy makers, academics, the media and other interested parties. While there are several types of composite indicators, this Handbook is concerned with those which compare and rank country performance in areas such as industrial competitiveness, sustainable development, globalisation and innovation. The Handbook aims to contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of composite indicators and to an improvement of the techniques currently used to build them. In particular, it contains a set of technical guidelines that can help constructors of composite indicators to improve the quality of their outputs. It has been prepared jointly by the OECD (the Statistics Directorate and the Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry) and the Applied Statistics and Econometrics Unit of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission in Ispra, Italy. Primary authors from the JRC are Michela Nardo, Michaela Saisana, Andrea Saltelli and Stefano Tarantola. Primary authors from the OECD are Anders Hoffmann and Enrico Giovannini. Editorial assistance was provided by Candice Stevens, Gunseli Baygan and Karsten Olsen. The research is partly funded by the European Commission, Research Directorate, under the project KEI (Knowledge Economy Indicators), Contract FP6 No. 502529. In the OECD context, the work has benefitted from a grant from the Danish government. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be regarded as stating an official position of either the European Commission or the OECD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications
Cortina, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 · Cited by 8,810 · cited 1×
“Cronbach Coefficient Alpha The Cronbach Coefficient Alpha (henceforth c-alpha) (Cronbach, 1951) is the most common estimate of internal consistency of items in a model or survey – Reliability/Item Analysis (e.g. Boscarino et al., 2004; Raykov, 1998; Cortina, 1993; Feldt et al., 1987; Green et al., 1977; Hattie, 1985;…”
MethodForecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter
Harvey, A. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107049994 · Cited by 4,195
On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals
Sobol', I. M. (1967) · USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9 · Cited by 2,975
Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices
Saltelli, A. (2002) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00280-1 · Cited by 2,228
Self-citationLimitations of Coefficient Alpha as an Index of Test Unidimensionality1
Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. A. (1977) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447703700403 · Cited by 522
Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach
Ebert, U., & Welsch, H. (2004) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2003.09.001 · Cited by 432 · cited 1×
“59 NORMALISATION The objective is to identify the most suitable normalization procedures to apply to the problem at hand, taking into account their properties with respect to the measurement units in which the indicators are expressed, and their robustness to possible outliers in the data (Ebert and Welsch, 2004).”
Method
Cited by
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9 · Cited by 1,325
Hinkel, J. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002 · Cited by 1,084
An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators
Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., & Puyenbroeck, T. V. (2007) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7 · Cited by 728
Regional Governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States
Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.770141 · Cited by 646
National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards
Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Teksoz, K., Durand-Delacre, D., & Sachs, J. D. (2017) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2985 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffmann, A., & Giovannini, E.
- Venue
- OECD Statistics Working Papers
- Published
- 2005-08-09
- ISSN
- 1815-2031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1484750607
- Cited by
- 2,671
- References
- 7
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/533411815016
- The paper
- Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffmann, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD Statistics Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/533411815016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.