The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International assessment of the use and results of patient-reported outcome measures for hip and knee replacement surgery: Findings of the OECD Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) working group on hip and knee replacement surgery
Open accessAbstract
Osteoarthritis impacts 7% of the global population, affecting more than 500 million people worldwide. As populations of OECD countries age, an increasing number of hip and knee replacement surgeries calls for further work on assessment of quality of care, particularly from patients’ point of view. Thirteen programmes from nine countries participated in the PaRIS Hip and Knee PROMs comparative reporting in 2020-21 by collecting and submitting data by generic and condition-specific PROMs. All programmes showed improvements in patient outcomes though the relative improvement varied. Crosswalks from SF-12 to EQ-5D provided valuable lessons on conversion errors. Results of this work call for improving the use of data for comparative reporting as well as further collaboration on utilising patient-reported metrics in quality-of-care improvement and policymaking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply
(2008) · Americanae (AECID Library) · doi:10.1016/s0140 · Cited by 22,524
Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets
van Hout, B., Janssen, M. F., Feng, Y.-S., Kohlmann, T., Busschbach, J., Golicki, D., Lloyd, A., Scalone, L., Kind, P., & Pickard, A. S. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008 · Cited by 2,153
(2019) · doi:10.1787/4dd50c09-en · Cited by 1,324
US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model
Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003 · Cited by 1,274
Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators
OECD (2021) · Health at a Glance · doi:10.1787/ae3016b9-en · Cited by 1,212
Osteoarthritis in 2020 and beyond: a Lancet Commission
Hunter, D. J., March, L., & Chew, M. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32230-3 · Cited by 902
Preference-Based EQ-5D Index Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States
Sullivan, P. W., & Ghushchyan, V. (2006) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x06290495 · Cited by 705
Rolfson, O., Bohm, E., Franklin, P., Lyman, S., Denissen, G., Dawson, J., Dunn, J., Eresian Chenok, K., Dunbar, M., Overgaard, S., et al. (2016) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816 · Cited by 323
Survey results: National health data infrastructure and governance
Oderkirk, J. (2021) · OECD health working papers · doi:10.1787/55d24b5d-en · Cited by 216
Barbazza, E. S., Klazinga, N., & Kringos, D. S. (2021) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011247 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Venue
- OECD Health Working Papers
- Published
- 2022-09-30
- ISSN
- 1815-2015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4298144291
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 13
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International assessment of the use and results of patient-reported outcome measures for hip and knee replacement surgery: Findings of the OECD Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) working group on hip and knee replacement surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/6da7f06b-en
- The paper
- International assessment of the use and results of patient-reported outcome measures for hip and knee replacement surgery: Findings of the OECD Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) working group on hip and knee replacement surgery. (2022). OECD Health Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/6da7f06b-en
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
