The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Government at a Glance: How Hungary Compares
Abstract
Government at a Glance: How Hungary Compares presents recent comparable data on key indicators of government activities and performance in Hungary, compared with its neighbouring countries (Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, Slovak Republic and Slovenia) as well as the OECD average. The main goal of this publication is to identify progress and persisting challenges in public sector reform in Hungary and to highlight some areas where public sector efficiency might be further improved in future years. It provides indicators on a wide range of government activities, including public finance management, public employment and pay, administrative burden for businesses, and the delivery of services in two key areas (health care and education).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In recent years, persistent education performance gaps with regard to socioeconomic background of students have been observed in Hungary, with 23% of the variation in students ' mathematics performance being explained by differences in their SES background, well above the average of 15% for OECD countries (OECD 2015).”
From Socioeconomic Inequality and Educational Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as OECD 2015
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of the Literature on Socioeconomic Status and Educational Achievement
Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019) · IEA research for education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1_2 · Cited by 198
Socioeconomic Inequality and Educational Outcomes
Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019) · IEA Research for Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1 · Cited by 145
Escaping From the Poverty Trap With Social Innovation: A Social Microcredit Programme in HungaryPreprint
Molnár, G., & Havas, A. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3390420 · Cited by 1
Hazafi, Z. (2016) · Central European Public Administration Review · doi:10.17573/ipar.2016.4.05
A közigazgatás létszáma a személyzetpolitika szemszögéből
Hazafi, Z. (2016) · Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás
Metadata
- Authors
- OECD
- Corresponding author
- OECD
- Venue
- OECD eBooks
- Publisher
- OECD
- Published
- 2015-05-20
- OpenAlex
- W4239675051
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- OECD eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- public sector reform, administrative efficiency, government performance, public financial management, public sector employees, administrative burden, trade regulation, health care delivery, education service delivery, Hungary, Central and Eastern Europe, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Government at a Glance: How Hungary Compares. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/9789264233720-en
- The paper
- OECD. (2015). Government at a Glance: How Hungary Compares. OECD eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264233720-en