The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators
Abstract
Indicator A4 examines intergenerational mobility in education, comparing educational attainment of young adults relative to that of their parents, and the type of tertiary education they are more likely to obtain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This tendency can likely be explained by (1) the greater share of high-skill employment in urban centres ([9], pp. 27 -32, 2) the greater number of higher education institutions in urban centres and (3) the stability of educational attainment over generations ([32], pp. 76 -77).”
From The opportunity of shared autonomous vehicles to improve spatial equity in accessibility and socio-economic developments in European urban areas (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eppenberger, N., & Richter, M. A. (2021) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-021-00484-4 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- OECD
- Corresponding author
- OECD
- Venue
- Education at a Glance
- Publisher
- OECD
- Published
- 2017-09-12
- Pages
- 76-87
- ISSN
- 1563-051X (ISSN-L)
- 1999-1487
- OpenAlex
- W4232786359
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Education at a glance. OECD indicators/Education at a glance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- intergenerational mobility, parental education, educational attainment, young adults, higher education, educational inequality, parental influence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
