The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
A mathematical model of glucose metabolism in hospitalized patients with diabetes and stress hyperglycemia
Open accessAbstract
The human body employs several mechanisms to regulate the concentration of glucose in the bloodstream. The rates of glucose uptake and release from specific organs within the body are modulated directly by the concentrations of metabolites and hormones, and indirectly by the autonomic nervous system. The negative feedback relationship between glucose and the anabolic hormone, insulin, dominates the process of glycemic regulation. The binding of insulin to its receptor begins a cascade of intracellular events that increases glucose uptake into the liver and peripheral tissue and reduces glucose release from the liver. However, this mechanism can be overwhelmed during the acute stress typified by a moderate surgical procedure. Cellular damage and tissue trauma cause a surge in catabolic hormones and cytokines, leading to insulin resistance and marked hyperglycemia. The focus of this study is the mathematical descriptions of the processes that regulate glucose production and uptake. Such descriptions model the complex relationships between metabolites and hormones and their effects on glycemia. Descriptive models that are accurate and robust have the potential to guide the development of tools designed to manage glycemia in hospitalized patients with diabetes and stress-induced hyperglycemia. Specifically, we investigate the validity of a glucose metabolism model published by John Sorensen in a 1985 doctoral thesis. The model is a set of 22 first-order time-invariant nonlinear differential equations describing the interaction of glucose, insulin and glucagon and their effect on organ-level glucose uptake and release. We modified the model to incorporate recent experimental data, including data we have collected in clinical trials. The model was expanded to include a description of epinephrine and its effects on glycemia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, studies have shown that surgery-induced metabolic stress, which causes the acute elevation of epinephrine, can significantly increase the rate of dysglycemia and the mortality of hospitalized patients (30).”
From The progression of secondary diabetes: A review of modeling studies (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The progression of secondary diabetes: A review of modeling studies
Yang, B., Li, J., Haller, M. J., Schatz, D. A., & Rong, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.1070979 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Hipszer, B. R., & Kam, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Dhaka (BD)
- Drexel University (US)
- ORCID
- Kam, Moshe
- Publisher
- Drexel University Libraries
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- OpenAlex
- W4206361297
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- iDEA - Drexel University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Keywords
- glucose metabolism, mathematical model, diabetes mellitus, stress hyperglycemia, glycemic regulation, insulin, glucagon, epinephrine, insulin resistance, glucose uptake, glucose production, hospitalized patients, surgical stress, model validation, nonlinear differential equations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review