Cited by 23Gender and Feminist StudiesIndigenous Cultures and HistoryGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gender Relations in Native North America

Open access
Bonvillain, Nancy·1989·American Indian Culture and Research Journal

Abstract

Analyse comparative de la conception de la difference sexuelle chez les Montagnais-Naskapi, Navajo, Inuit, Iroquois et Indiens des Plaines

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17953/aicr.13.2.c011522t5g32l488

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bonvillain, N.
Corresponding author
Bonvillain, Nancy
Venue
American Indian Culture and Research Journal
Published
1989-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
1-28
ISSN
0161-6463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W52628795
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • American Indian Culture and Research Journal (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
gender relations, gender roles, Native American societies, male dominance, status inequality, Naskapi, Navajo, Eskimos, Iroquois, colonialism, ecological context, women's status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review