CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

Are You Deaf or Hard of Hearing? Which Do You Go by: Perceptions of Identity in Families of Students with Hearing Loss

Kemmery, Megan A., Compton, Mary V.·2014·The Volta Review
DOI 10.17955/tvr.114.2.748
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17955/tvr.114.2.748

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HOH adolescents in the United States expressed that their identity varied depending on context.

    “In a phenomenological study, HOH adolescents in the United States expressed that their identity varied depending on context (Kemmery & Compton 2014:170).”

    From Identity construction among deaf adolescents and young adults: A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Kemmery & Compton 2014

  • The formation of identity in the context of DHL is a challenging and complex process.

    “The formation of identity in the context of DHL is a challenging and complex process (English 2012; Kemmery & Compton 2014).”

    From Identity construction among deaf adolescents and young adults: A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Kemmery & Compton 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemmery, M. A., & Compton, M. V.
Venue
The Volta Review
Publisher
Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Published
2014-09
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
157-192
ISSN
0042-8639
DOI
10.17955/tvr.114.2.748
Cited by
13
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review