Cited by 2Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesPlant and fungal interactionsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Endophytic Fungal Community of Pinus densiflora Infected by Different Incidences of Sphaeropsis sapinea in a Mixed Coniferous Forest

Open access
Xie, Xian, Liang, Jun, Zhang, Ming, Hu, Ruirui, Cheng, Yuan, Zhang, Xingyao·2019·International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Abstract

Shoot blight of pine caused by Sphaeropsis sapinea is a serious threat to the health of Pinus densiflora.However, little is known about the effect of S. sapinea on the structure of endophytic fungal communities in needles of P. densiflora.In this study, the diversity and structure of the endophytic fungal communities associated with asymptomatic and symptomatic needles of P. densiflora were investigated.Needles of P. densiflora were sampled from mixed coniferous forests, and high through-put sequencing was used to determine the diversity and community structure of endophytic fungi.The results demonstrated that endophytic fungal abundance increased when the lesion length was longer, and the endophytic fungal diversity showed an upward trend as the infection of S. sapinea worsened.The dominant genera of endophytic fungi in asymptomatic needles of P. densiflora in mixed coniferous forest was Paraconiothyrium and Selenophoma.Cenangium is considered to have a certain association with S. sapinea infection in the endophytic fungal community.The results showed that S. sapinea infection affected the endophytic fungal community in needles of P. densiflora in a mixed coniferous forest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17957/ijab/15.1384

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 2

Metadata

Authors
Xie, X., Liang, J., Zhang, M., Hu, R., Cheng, Y., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN)
Venue
International Journal of Agriculture and Biology
Published
2019
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
1044-1050
ISSN
1560-8530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045877190
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Agriculture and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • International Journal of Agriculture and Biology
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270682)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
endophytic fungi, Pinus densiflora, Sphaeropsis sapinea, shoot blight, fungal community structure, fungal diversity, mixed conifer forest, Paraconiothyrium, host-pathogen interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endophytic Fungal Community of Pinus densiflora Infected by Different Incidences of Sphaeropsis sapinea in a Mixed Coniferous Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17957/ijab/15.1384
The paper
Xie, X., Liang, J., Zhang, M., Hu, R., Cheng, Y., & Zhang, X. (2019). Endophytic Fungal Community of Pinus densiflora Infected by Different Incidences of Sphaeropsis sapinea in a Mixed Coniferous Forest. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. https://doi.org/10.17957/ijab/15.1384