The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience
Open accessAbstract
Present study aims at studying the influence of the emotional intelligence, age and qualification on the teacher effectiveness of the teachers. The study population included secondary schools teachers working in Jalandhar and Ludhiana districts of Punjab, India. Using a multi-stage random sampling method, a sample volume of 739 teachers was determined. Two main instruments were used to measure the study variables: a 80-item questionnaire by C R Darolia on emotional intelligence (five scales: Self-awareness, Motivating Oneself, Managing Emotions, Empathy and Handling Relations, and a 60item Teacher Effectiveness Scale by Kumar and Mutha, 1985. The frequency, mean and standard deviation values were calculated and a 3 way ANOVA analysis was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the findings. The study results revealed that: (a) Differences in teacher effectiveness of groups of teachers’ based on school type i.e. government and private secondary schools, are not significant. (b) Teachers with low emotional intelligence are less effective in teaching than teachers with high emotional intelligence. c) More experienced teachers are found to be more effective than less experienced teachers. Thus, it can be concluded that emotional intelligence and teaching experience matters in making of a teacher to be effective
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Their ANOVA analysis showed that teachers with high EI were more effective than those with lower EI.”
From Nexus between Emotional Intelligence and Teacher Effectiveness: A Quantitative Study in Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan (2025) · cites this paper as Kauts and Chechi (2014)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Kauts, A., & Chechi, V. K. (2014). Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 4(2), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.08411
- [1]Kauts A, Chechi VK. Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience. AJESI. 2014;4(2):63-81. doi:10.18039/ajesi.08411
- Kauts, Amit, ve Vijay Kumar Chechi. 2014. “Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience”. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International 4 (2): 63-81. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.08411.
- Kauts A, Chechi VK (01 Aralık 2014) Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International 4 2 63–81.
- Kauts, Amit - Chechi, Vijay Kumar. “Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience”. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International 4/2 (01 Aralık 2014): 63-81. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.08411.
- [1]Kauts A, Chechi VK. Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience. AJESI. 2014;4:63–81.
- Kauts, Amit, ve Vijay Kumar Chechi. “Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience”. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, c. 4, sy 2, Aralık 2014, ss. 63-81, doi:10.18039/ajesi.08411.
- [1]Amit Kauts, Vijay Kumar Chechi. Teacher Effectiveness in Relation to Type of Institution, Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Experience. AJESI. 01 Aralık 2014;4(2):63-81. doi:10.18039/ajesi.08411
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hina, H., Khan, D. S. I., & Bano, D. H. (2025) · The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies · doi:10.59075/crsver51
Metadata
- Authors
- Kauts, A., & Chechi, V. K.
- Affiliations
- Lovely Professional University (IN)
- Venue
- Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2146-4014 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151896449
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dergipark.org.tr
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International (publishedVersion)
- DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
- DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
- Keywords
- teacher effectiveness, emotional intelligence, teaching experience, school type, government vs private schools, secondary school teachers, self-awareness, empathy, emotional management, teacher age, teacher qualifications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review