The crucial role of academic medical centers in preparing for the future of health AI
Open accessAbstract
By Michael J. Pencina, Mary E. Klotman. Academic medical centers (AMCs) are struggling to keep up with the breakneck pace of change and navigate an ever-increasing resource mismatch between academia and industry.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guidelines and practical strategies have been proposed to ensure ethical implementation and maintain scientific rigor.
“Guidelines and practical strategies have been proposed to ensure ethical implementation and maintain scientific rigor [8–10].”
From Integrating large language models in biostatistical workflows for clinical and translational research (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [1]The Dartmouth College Artificial Intelligence Conference: The Next Fifty Years AI Magazine Moor J. 2006 2024-4-18 https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/1911/1809
- [3]Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead Nat Mach Intell Rudin C. 2019 1 5 206 215 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x 35603010 PMC9122117 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]Temporal quality degradation in AI models Sci Rep Vela D. Sharp A. Zhang R. Nguyen T. Hoang A. Pianykh O. S. 2022 12 1 11654 10.1038/s41598-022-15245-z https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15245-z 35803963 PMC9270447 · DOI
- [5]Factors associated with variability in the performance of a proprietary sepsis prediction model across 9 networked hospitals in the US JAMA Intern Med Lyons P. G. Hofford M. R. Yu S. C.. 2023 183 6 611 612 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7182 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7182 37010858 PMC10071393 · DOI · Paper page
- [9]Mitigating racial and ethnic bias and advancing health equity in clinical algorithms: a scoping review Health Aff (Millwood) Cary M. P., Jr. Zink A. Wei S.. 2023 42 10 1359 1368 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00553 https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00553 37782868 PMC10668606 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Pencina, M. J., & Klotman, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- North Carolina Medical Journal
- Publisher
- North Carolina Institute of Medicine
- Published
- 2024-07-11
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 241-243
- ISSN
- 0029-2559 (ISSN-L)
- 2379-4313
- PMC
- PMC13368198
- OpenAlex
- W4400542940
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- North Carolina Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
- Keywords
- academic medical centers, artificial intelligence in healthcare, health AI, academia-industry collaboration, resource mismatch, future of health care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
