The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Introduction: Anthropology in Disability Studies
Open accessAbstract
No abstract available
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“These three distinct cultural discourses share a perspective of the universe organized across a grid of rigid dichotomies [9, 39, 40].”
From The person in the disabled body: a perspective on culture and personhood from the margins (2016) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Kasnitz, D & Shuttleworth, R. (2001) 'Introduction: Anthropology in Disability Studies', Disability Studies Quarterly. 21(3) doi: 10.18061/dsq.v21i3.289
- Kasnitz, D & Shuttleworth, R. Introduction: Anthropology in Disability Studies. Disability Studies Quarterly. 2001 7; %}21(3) doi: 10.18061/dsq.v21i3.289
- Kasnitz, D & Shuttleworth, R. (2001, 7 15). Introduction: Anthropology in Disability Studies. Disability Studies Quarterly 21(3) doi: 10.18061/dsq.v21i3.289
Cited by
Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (2013) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155502 · Cited by 257
The autism predicament: models of autism and their impact on autistic identity
Anderson-Chavarria, M. (2021) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2021.1877117 · Cited by 159
“There is no absolute’ (Kasnitz and Shuttleworth 2001, 5).”
BackgroundKohrman, M. (2005) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/california/9780520226449.001.0001 · Cited by 109
Anthropological Theories of Disability
Reid-Cunningham, A. R. (2009) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911350802631644 · Cited by 124
“(Kasnitz & Shuttleworth 2001, p. 2)”
Mills, M. C. 2. /. J., & Sanchez, R. (2023) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9781479819386.001.0001 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasnitz, D., & Shuttleworth, R.
- ORCID
- Kasnitz, Devva
- Venue
- Disability Studies Quarterly
- Publisher
- The Ohio State University Libraries
- Published
- 2001-07-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1041-5718 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8371
- OpenAlex
- W1582855372
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Disability Studies Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Keywords
- disability studies, anthropology of disability, disability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction: Anthropology in Disability Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18061/dsq.v21i3.289
- The paper
- Kasnitz, D., & Shuttleworth, R. (2001). Introduction: Anthropology in Disability Studies. Disability Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v21i3.289
