Cited by 6Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDisability Rights and RepresentationDisability Education and Employment

Facilitated Communication Training: Exploration of perceptions of ability and reducing physical support

Open access
Wilson, Matthew, De Jonge, Desleigh, De Souza, Nadera, Carlson, Glenys·2014·Disability Studies Quarterly

Abstract

Publication Notice May 29, 2019: The SDS Board, having examined the available archival record regarding the Wilson article, finds that the majority of evidence suggests that this article was listed as being published in DSQ Vol 34, No 1 (2014). Accordingly, the Board has directed The Ohio State University Libraries to publish this article with the issue. In making this decision regarding the circumstances of the article publication, the Board did not examine and makes no statement regarding the content of the article. Key words: Facilitated Communication Training; complex communication needs; reducing support; perceptions; disabilityAbstract: A growing number of people who use Facilitated Communication Training (FCT) are becoming independent of physical support. In response, this research investigated changes in family members’ perceptions of their son or daughter following the introduction of FCT, and how physical support was reduced over time. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who use FCT, their family members and their facilitators. It was found that once people commenced using FCT, they revealed unexpected abilities, thoughts and feelings which changed the way their family members perceived them. A number of strategies appeared to assist people who use FCT to reduce physical support. FCT was found to have had a profound impact on the lives of people and to assist in developing communication access without physical support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18061/dsq.v34i1.1741

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 6

Authors
Wilson, M., De Jonge, D., De Souza, N., & Carlson, G.
Venue
Disability Studies Quarterly
Published
2014-01-03
Volume
34
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1041-5718 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8371
OpenAlex
W2946979532
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Disability Studies Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
facilitated communication, complex communication needs, family perceptions, augmentative and alternative communication, disability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review