Cited by 107Disability Rights and RepresentationAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityHearing Impairment and Communication

Unsettling Languages, Unruly Bodyminds: A Crip Linguistics Manifesto

Open access
Henner, Jon, Robinson, Octavian·2023·Journal of Critical Study of Communication and Disability

Abstract

We introduce Crip Linguistics as a theoretical and abolitionist framework. People use languages in different ways. Some people use language to help find other people like themselves. Many people use language in specific ways because of how their body and mind work. Sometimes a person’s material conditions, and environment forces them to use language in a certain way. When someone languages outside of what people think is normal, others can think they are bad with language, or are not as smart as someone else. No one is actually ‘bad with language.’ We want to help people understand that no language is bad. It is okay to want to change your language use if it will make you feel better. No one should make you feel badly about your language. We need a bigger and more flexible understanding of what language is.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18061/jcscd.7119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-speech cues are central to disabled communicative practices, including those of autistic people, deaf people, and people with aphasia.

    “Beyond stuttering, non-speech cues are central to disabled communicative practices [41], including those of autistic people [3], deaf people [55], and people with aphasia [34].”
  • Many accessibility tasks require deeply personal embodied knowledge that disabled people possess, such as sign language translation and disabled people's non-normative communication practices.

    “Similarly, as explained in Section 8.1, many accessibility tasks require deeply personal embodied knowledge that disabled people possess, such as sign language translation [12, 95, 97], and disabled people's non-normative communication practices [3, 34, 41].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 107

Authors
Henner, J., & Robinson, O.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Gallaudet University (US)
Venue
Journal of Critical Study of Communication and Disability
Published
2023-04-16
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2997-3511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7166513925
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 9
FWCI
26.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Critical Study of Communication and Disability (publishedVersion)
  • AUL
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
disability studies, language and disability, body-mind, language use, abolitionism, disability theory, language ideology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review