Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transition to sustainable food systems : the Dutch circular approach providing solutions to global challenges

van Berkum, Siemen, Dengerink, Just·2019

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18174/495586

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Prof.dr.ir. J.G.A.J. (Jack) van der Vorst General Director Social Sciences Group (SSG) Wageningen University & Research
Prof.dr.ir. J.G.A.J. (Jack) van der Vorst General Director Social Sciences Group (SSG) Wageningen University & ResearchCC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 3.1 A way of mapping the relationships of food system activities to its drivers and outcomes Source: Van Berkum et al., 2018.
Figure 3.1 A way of mapping the relationships of food system activities to its drivers and outcomes Source: Van Berkum et al., 2018.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 3.2 A linear (top panel) and circular (bottom panel) food system
Figure 3.2 A linear (top panel) and circular (bottom panel) food systemCC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Table 3.2 Comparison of sustainable agriculture approaches on their coverage of the food system
Table 3.2 Comparison of sustainable agriculture approaches on their coverage of the food systemCC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Benin, S. (ed.), 2016. Agricultural productivity in Africa: Trends, patterns, and determinants. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). New York.
  2. Boyd, E., P. May, M. Chang and F.C. Veiga (2007). Exploring socioeconomic impacts of forest based mitigation projects: Lessons from Brazil and Bolivia. Environmental Science & Policy. Volume 10, Issue 5, August 2007, Pages 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.03.004 · DOI
  3. Bureau, J.C. and S. Jean (2013). Trade liberalisation in the bio-economy: coping with a new Landscape. Agricultural Economics vol. 44, issues 1, pages 173-182, https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12061 · DOI
  4. Bush, S.R. and M. Marschke (2017). Social and political ecology of fisheries and aquaculture in Southeast Asia. In Hirsch, P. (ed.) 'Handbook of Environment in Southeast Asia', pp. 224-238 (London: Routledge).
  5. Collison, M. P. (ed.) (2000). The history of farming system research. CABI.
  6. Day, C.G., C. van Oosten and L.E. Buck (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. PNAS, vol. 110, no. 21, 8349-8356. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1210595110 · DOI · Paper page
  7. EAT-Lancet Commission (2019). Food in The Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems. Lancet 2019; 393: 447-92
  8. FAO (2009). Food Security and Agricultural Mitigation in Developing Countries: Options for Capturing Synergies. FAO: Rome. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/3/i1318e/i1318e00.pdf ' FAO (2013). Climate smart agriculture sourcebook. FAO Rome. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7994e.pdf FAO (2016). Asia and the Pacific: Regional Overview of Food Insecurity. Investing in A Zero Hunger Generation. FAO: Bangkok. FAO (2017a). The future of food and agriculture. Trends and challenges. FAO, Rome FAO (2017b). Landscapes for Life: Approaches to landscape management for sustainable food and agriculture. FAO, Rome. FAO (2018). FAN: FAO Aquaculture Newsletter No. 58. FAO, Rome. FAO (2018a). Sustainable Food Systems, Concept and framework, attainable at http://www.fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA2079EN.pdf. FAO (2018b). Water stress and human migration: a global georeferenced review of empirical research. Rome, FAO, Land and Water discussion paper 11. FAO (2018c). The state of world's forests. FAO, Rome. FAO (2019). Morocco Country Profile, FAO: Rome. Retrieved from; http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#country/143.
  9. Garcia, E., F, S.V.R. Filho, G.M. Mallmann and F. Fonseca (2017). Costs, Benefits and Challenges of Sustainable Livestock Intensification in a Major Deforestation Frontier in the Brazilian Amazon. Sustainability 2017, 9, 158; doi:10.3390/su9010158 GLOPAN (Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition) (2016). Food systems and diets: Facing the challenges of the 21st century. London, UK. · DOI
  10. Hansen, A. (2018). Meat consumption and capitalist development: The meatification of food provision and practice in Vietnam. Geoforum. Volume 93, July 2018, Pages 57-68
  11. Hong, T. K. N., T.T.H. Phan, T.N.T. Tran and L. Philippe (2017). Vietnam's Fisheries and Aquaculture Development's Policy: Are Exports Performance Targets Sustainable?. Oceanogr Fish Open Access J. 2017; 5(4): 555667. DOI: 10.19080/OFOAJ.2017.05.555667 · DOI
  12. Ingram, J. (2011). A food systems approach to researching food security and its interactions with global environmental change. Food Security. 3. 10.1007/s12571-011-0149-9. · DOI
  13. Jurgilevich, A., T. Birge, J. Kentala-Lehtonen, K. Korhonen-Kurki, J. Pietikäinen, L. Saikku and H. Schösler (2016). Transition to circular economy in the food system. Sustainability 2016, 8, 69; doi:10.3390/su8010069 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lipper, L. and D. Zilberman (2018). A Short History of the Evolution of the Climate Smart Agriculture Approach and Its Links to Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture Debates. In: Lipper L., N. McCarty, D. Zilberman, S. Asfaw and G. Branca (eds.)> Climate smart agriculture. Building resilience to climate change. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-61194- · DOI
  15. Manners, R. and C. Varela-Ortega (2017). Analysing Latin American and Caribbean forest vulnerability from socio-economic factors, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 14:1, 109-130, DOI: 10.1080/1943815X.2017.1400981 · DOI
  16. Metson, G.S., K. MacDonals, D. Haberman, T. Nesme and E.M. Bennett (2016). Feeding the Corn Belt: Opportunities for phosphorus recycling in U.S. agriculture. Sience of The Total Environment, volume 542, part B, 15 January 2016, pp. 1117-1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.047 · DOI
  17. Mulia, R. and E. Simelton (eds.) (2018). Towards low-emissions landscapes in Viet Nam. World Agroforestry (ICRAF) Viet Nam, World Agroforestry (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Program, Bogor, Indonesia One Planet Sustainable Food Systems Programme, Towards a common understanding of Sustainable Food Systems (draft): One Planet, eat with care PBL (2015). The Landscape Approach, The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
  18. Pedersen, B. and S. Snapp (2015). What is sustainable intensification? Views from experts. Land Use Policy, volume 46, July 2015, pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.002 · DOI
  19. Ruben, R., J. Verhagen and C. Plaisier (2018). The challenge of food system research: what difference does it makes?. Sustainability 2019:11, 171. doi:10.3390/su11010171 · DOI
  20. Rutten, M., L. Shutes and G. Meijerink, 'Sit down at the Ball Game: How Trade Barriers Make the World Less Food Secure', Food Policy 38, no. 0 (February 2013): 1-10, doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.09.002. · DOI
  21. Sayer, J., T. Sunderland, J. Ghazoul, J.-L. Pfund, D. Sheilb, E. Meijaard, M. Venter, A.K. Boedhihartono, M. Day, C. Garcia, C. van Oosten and L.E. Buck (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. PNAS, vol. 110, no. 21, 8349-8356. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1210595110 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sayer, J., T. Sunderland, J. Ghazoul, J.-L. Pfund, D. Sheilb, E. Meijaard, M. Venter, A.K. Boedhihartono, M. Serraj., R. and P. Pingalu (eds.) (2019). Agriculture and food systems to 2050. Global trends, challenges and opportunities. The World Scientific Series in Grand Public Policy Challenges of the 21st Century. Volume 2.
  23. Shaner, W. W., P.F. Philipps, and W.R. Schmehl. (1982). Farming Systems Research and Development: A Guidline for Developing Countries. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  24. Struik, P. and T. Kuyper (2017). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 37. 10.1007/s13593-017-0445-7. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
van Berkum, S., & Dengerink, J.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research
Published
2019
Cited by
9
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review