Stereotype Threat among Latino School Age Children
Open accessAbstract
Stereotype threat has been proposed as a potential explanation for the academic achievement gap.Although the achievement gap begins early in school, little research has examined whether susceptibility to stereotype threat exists for typical academic tasks in elementary school age children.The current study examined stereotype threat effect among firstand second-generation Mexican immigrant school-age children in the United States.Specifically, the study examined whether stereotype threat impacted Latino children's performance on a math task, and whether generational status and ethnicity salience served as moderators of the threat.Results indicated that the participants in the stereotype threat condition performed significantly worse on the math task than the participants in the control condition, especially if the participants' ethnicity was moderately salient.Students who did not perceive ethnicity to be salient and those who perceived ethnicity to be highly salient showed no differences across threat conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social identity threat and/or identity incompatibility have been found to reduce academic performance of Black and Latino students, lower social class students, children of immigrants, women and girls in stereotypically masculine subjects, and boys in stereotypically feminine subjects.
“Social identity threat and/or identity incompatibility have been found to reduce the performance of Black and Latino students in U.S. schools and colleges (Chu & Brown, 2017;Gonzales, Blanton, & Williams, 2002;Steele & Aronson, 1995); students and young children of lower social class in the United States (Désert, Préaux, & Jund, 2009;B. Spencer & Castano, 2007), France (Croizet & Claire, 1998),”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Chu & Brown, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions
Easterbrook, M. J., & Hadden, I. R. (2021) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12070 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chu, H., & Spears Brown, C.
- ORCID
- Chu, Hui
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
- Publisher
- EJournal Publishing
- Published
- 2017-04
- Pages
- 278-281
- ISSN
- 2010-3646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7202291103
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Social Science and Humanity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- stereotype threat, Latino children, Mexican immigrants, immigrant children, achievement gap, mathematics achievement, generational status, elementary school students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review