The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Misreporting in Sensitive Health Behaviors and Its Impact on Treatment Effects: An Application to Intimate Partner Violence
Open accessAbstract
A growing literature seeks to identify policies that could reduce intimate partner violence. However, in the absence of reliable administrative records, this violence is often measured using self-reported data from health surveys. In this paper, an experiment is conducted comparing data from such surveys against a methodology that provides greater privacy to the respondent. Non-classical measurement error in health surveys is identified as college-educated women, but not the less educated, underreport physical and sexual violence. The paper provides a low-cost solution to correct the bias in the estimation of causal effects under non-classical measurement error in the dependent variable.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We use list experiment (LE) or item count technique (ICT), which is a methodology that intends to reduce potential social desirability biases by increasing respondents' perception of privacy.”
From How Accurately are Household Surveys Measuring the Size and Inequalities for the LGBT Population in Bogota, Colombia? Evidence from a List Experiment (2023) · cites this paper as Agüero & Frisancho, 2017
Citations
Cites
The gender wage gap and domestic violence
Aizer, A. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1847 · Cited by 828
Tip of the iceberg: reporting and gender-based violence in developing countries
Palermo, T., Bleck, J., & Peterman, A. (2014) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwt295 · Cited by 480
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ham, A., Guarin, A., & Ruiz, J. (2023) · doi:10.18235/0004721 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Agüero, J. M., & Frisancho, V.
- Publisher
- Inter-American Development Bank
- Published
- 2017-12-06
- OpenAlex
- W2777299404
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, underreporting, measurement error, self-reported data, college-educated women, physical violence, sexual violence, causal effect estimation, survey data quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
