The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Performing State: Reflection on an Idea Whose Time Has Come but Whose Implementation Has Not
Open accessAbstract
The contemporary nation-state exists to perform, to provide financial assistance, public services and other benefits to its people. How well the government performs influences the economic and social well-being of citizens, the mindset that voters take into the election booth, the programs and behavior of politicians and bureaucrats, and the relationship between government and the governed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Traditionally, most developing economies-including Algeriaadopted line-item or input-based budgeting, emphasizing expenditure compliance and legality rather than the attainment of measurable policy outcomes (Schick, 2003).”
From BUDGETARY REFORM IN ALGERIA UNDER THE ORGANIC LAW NO. 18-15: TOWARDS A RESULTS-ORIENTED FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE (2025) · cites this paper as Schick, 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Susan Pharr and Robert D. Putnam (eds.) Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries, Princeton University Press, 2000.
- A favourable assessment of the Next Steps initiative is presented in David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, Banishing Bureaucracy, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1997.
- Ropert Kaplan and David Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action, Harvard Business School Press, 1996, p. 10.
- David Osborn and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Addison-Welsey Publishing Company, 1992.
- See B. Guy Peters, The Future of Governing, University Press of Kansas, 2001 for a discussion of these and alternative models of governance.
Cited by
Mohamed, L. (2025) · International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy · doi:10.31435/ijite.4(52).2025.4497 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Schick, A.
- Affiliations
- Brookings Institution (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schick, Allen
- Publisher
- Inter-American Development Bank
- Published
- 2003-12-11
- OpenAlex
- W4392449873
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- nation-state, government performance, public services, welfare provision, state-citizen relations, political behavior, bureaucracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
