The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Impact Evaluation of Chile's Progressive Housing Program
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents the findings of an evaluation of Chile's Progressive Housing Program (PHP), which is a public housing program that finances the purchase of a new house for lower income households. The evaluation finds that the programs' package (savings requirement, voucher and mortgage) design is inappropriate if the program is targeted to the poor. In fact the pro-poor targeting of the program was poor with high under-coverage and high leakage. Furthermore, the benefit of a minimum quality new house was not sustainable as many households slipped back into the housing shortage category overtime. This impact evaluation reveals that although the program had significant positive effects on materiality conditions (access to water, sewerage, and electricity), it had a negative effect on overcrowding, and had no discernible effects on welfare indicators (poverty, school attendance, occupation ratio).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Marcano 2008 Not relevant setting ‐ confirmed with authors that the programme was not targeted to slum dwellers.”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Marcano 2008
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Lambert, P., The Distribution and Redistribution of Income, Third Edition, Manchester University Press, 2001.
- Rojas E. "The Long Road to Housing Sector Reform: Lessons from the Chilean Housing Experience", Housing Studies, Vol. 16, No.4, 2001.
- Sabatini F., "Land Market Reform and Residential Segregation in Chile", Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Conference Paper, 2003.
- Sabatini F., Cáceres G., and Cerda J., "Residential Segregation Pattern Changes in Main Chilean Cities: Scale Shifts and Increasing Malignancy", Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, conference paper for the course titled "International Seminar on Segregation in the City," July 26-28, 2001.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Turley, R., Saith, R., Bhan, N., Rehfuess, E., & Carter, B. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010067.pub2 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcano, L., & Ruprah, I. J.
- Affiliations
- Inter-American Development Bank (US)
- Publisher
- Inter-American Development Bank
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W1926740839
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Social Sciences › Development › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
- Keywords
- public housing, housing vouchers, housing subsidies, targeting of the poor, undercoverage, leakage, housing shortage, household welfare, poverty, overcrowding, access to utilities, Chile
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
