The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Impact Evaluation of a Neighbourhood Crime Prevention Program: Does Safer Commune Make Chileans Safer?
Open accessAbstract
This working paper discusses "Safer Commune" - a neighbourhood crime prevention program in Chile that has come under criticism via evidence of rising crime rates and fear of crime in municipalities with the program. The author argues that this criticism is incorrect and shows empirical evidence that the crime rates that would have been observed without the program. This impact evaluation -using the double difference propensity score method- reveals that the program has reduced high crimes particularly of two types of crimes namely battery and theft. The author shows that active participation in the program by local residents has reduced insecurity and increased security; but with very low active participation in the program the scale of the effect is low. Positive evaluative findings suggest that an expansion of the program and simultaneously enhancing co-production of order through mechanisms to encourage local resident participation would have high returns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Ruprah 2008 Ineligible setting ‐ the paper deals with the evaluation of a crime prevention strategy which included crime prevention ‐ but does not appear specific to slums (no mention of slum communities or UN slum criteria apparent).”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Ruprah 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dammert L., and M. Malone, "Fear of Crime or Fear of Life? Public Insecurities in Chile", Bulletin of Latin American Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2003.
- Sampson R., and J. Wooldridge "Linking the micro and macro-level dimensions of life style-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimisation" Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol 3, No. 4, December 1987.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Turley, R., Saith, R., Bhan, N., Rehfuess, E., & Carter, B. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010067.pub2 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruprah, I. J.
- Affiliations
- Inter-American Development Bank (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ruprah, Inder J.
- Publisher
- Inter-American Development Bank
- Published
- 2008-11-01
- OpenAlex
- W2201800524
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- crime prevention programs, crime rates, fear of crime, batteries, theft, local population participation, program impact evaluation, Chile
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Impact Evaluation of a Neighbourhood Crime Prevention Program: Does Safer Commune Make Chileans Safer? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18235/0011172
- The paper
- Ruprah, I. J. (2008). An Impact Evaluation of a Neighbourhood Crime Prevention Program: Does Safer Commune Make Chileans Safer? https://doi.org/10.18235/0011172