Engineering Management , The Body of Knowledge as Defined by Coursework
Open accessAbstract
This paper looks at what is typically involved in the EM master's degree as offered by the larger programs.The schools used in this analysis were selected based on their reported enrollments.The degree requirements are based on the information posted on the academic programs' websites.This paper attempts to quantify the body of knowledge for the discipline based on what is taught by these programs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peterson and Humble identified that 75% of the students in USA Engineering Management programs in 2004 were taken for master programs.
“They identified that 75% of the students were taken for master programs.”
From Experiences with Capstone Projects in a Master of Engineering Management Program: A Case Study (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Experiences with Capstone Projects in a Master of Engineering Management Program: A Case Study
Hilal-Alnaqbi, A., & Sivaloganathan, S. (2015) · 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings · doi:10.18260/p.24056
- Authors
- Peterson, W., & Humble, J.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Peterson, William
- Venue
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
- Publisher
- ASEE Conferences
- Published
- 2020-09-03
- Pages
- 12.647.1-12.647.8
- OpenAlex
- W2621593553
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- engineering management, master's degree program, curriculum evaluation, coursework, body of knowledge, degree requirements, academic programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
