Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

A Conceptual Model For Capstone Engineering Design Performance And Assessment

Davis, Denny, Beyerlein, Steven, Harrison, Olakunle, Thompson, Phillip, Trevisan, Michael, Mount, Benjamin·2020·2006 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
DOI 10.18260/1-2--724
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18260/1-2--724

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. National Research Council (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
  2. Dym, C. L., A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer. (2005). "Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning." Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1): 103- 120.
  3. Dutson, A. J., R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby and C. D. Sorenson. (1997) "A Review of Literature on Teaching Design through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses," Journal of Engineering Education 76(1): 17-28.
  4. McKenzie, L., M. Trevisan, D. Davis, and S. Beyerlein. (2004). "Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study." American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. Page 11.34.13
  5. Davis, D., M. Trevisan, L. McKenzie, S. Beyerlein, P. Daniels, T. Rutar, P. Thompson, and K. Gentili (2002). "Practices for Quality Implementation of the TIDEE 'Design Team Readiness Assessment'". Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Montreal, QE.
  6. Atman, C. J. and K. M. Bursic (1998). "Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes." Journal of Engineering Education 87(2): 121-132.
  7. Cardella, M. E., C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, and J. Turns. (2002). "Engineering Student Design Processes: Looking at Evaluation Practices Across Problems." American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.
  8. Mosborg, S., R. Adams, R. Kim, C. J. Atman, J. Turns, and M. Cardella. (2005). "Conceptions of the Engineering Design Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals." American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
  9. Sobek, D. K. (2002). "Use of Journals to Evaluate Student Design Processes." American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
  10. Sobek, D. K. I. and V. Jain (2004). "Two Instruments for Assessing Design Outcomes of Capstone Projects." Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT.
  11. Brackin, M. P. and J. Williams (2001). "Teaching and Assessing Team Skills in a Senior Level Design Course." Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Albuquerque, NM.
  12. Davis, D. C., S. W. Beyerlein, and I. T. Davis. (2006). "Deriving Design Course Learning Outcomes from a Professional Profile," International Journal of Engineering Education 22(1).
  13. Dwarakanath, S. and K. M. Wallace (1995). "Decision-making in engineering design: Observations from design experiments." Journal of Engineering Education 6(3): 191-206.
  14. Turns, J. (1997). "Learning Essays and the Reflective Learner: Supporting Assessment in Engineering Design Education." Frontiers in Education Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
  15. Adams, R. and J. Turns, and C. J. Atman. (2003). "Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice." Design Studies 24(3): 275-294.
  16. Atman, C. J., J. R. Chimka, K. M. Bursic, and H. L. Nachtmann. (1999). "A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes." Design Studies 20(2): 131-152.
  17. Adams, R. and C. J. Atman. (1999). "Cognitive Processes in Iterative Design Behavior." Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
  18. Brinkman, G. W. and T. M. Geest (2003). "Assessment of Communication Competencies in Engineering Design Projects." Technical Communication Quarterly 12(1): 67-81.
  19. Bogusch, L. L., J. Turns, and C. J. Atman. (2000). "Engineering Design Factors: How Broadly Do Students Define Problems?" Frontiers in Education Conference, vol. 2, S3A/7- S3A12, Kansas City, MO.
  20. Trevisan, M., D. Davis, S. Beyerlein, P. Thompson, and O. Harrison. (2006). "Evidence of Effective Formative Classroom Assessment in Capstone Engineering Design Literature." Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Chicago, IL.
  21. Lumsdaine, E., M. Lumsdaine, and J. W. Shelnutt. (1999). Creative Problem Solving and Engineering Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  22. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, Washington DC: National Academies Press.
  23. Davis, D. C., S. W. Beyerlein, and I. T. Davis. (2005). "Development and Use of an Engineer Profile." Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Portland, OR.
  24. Gentili, K., J. Lyons, E. Davishahl, D. Davis, and S. Beyerlein. (2005). "Measuring Added- Value Using Team Design Skills and Growth Survey." Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Portland, OR.
  25. Dominick, P. G., J. T. Demel, W. M. Lawbaugh, R. T. Freuler, G. L. Kinzel, and E. Fromm. (2001). Tools and Tactics of Design. John Wiley & Sons.
  26. McGourty, J. and K. P. De Meuse. (2001). The Team Developer: An Assessment and Skill Building Program. John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., Harrison, O., Thompson, P., Trevisan, M., & Mount, B.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University
  • University of Idaho
  • Tuskegee University
  • Seattle University
Venue
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
Publisher
ASEE Conferences
Published
2020
Pages
11.34.1-11.34.15
DOI
10.18260/1-2--724
Cited by
2
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Conceptual Model For Capstone Engineering Design Performance And Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18260/1-2--724
The paper
Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., Harrison, O., Thompson, P., Trevisan, M., & Mount, B. (2020). A Conceptual Model For Capstone Engineering Design Performance And Assessment. 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--724

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.